Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Hancock Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Massachusetts (MA)
  4. Quincy
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Debra Maloney
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    this was my dad's third trip to this rehab..wonderful staff from the Nursing, PT/OT/ nurses aides and social workers.. His NP and MD were very in tune to his complex medical issues. As a nurse I am very observant and cannot say how bright and caring and professional the staff have been over the past 5 weeks,,The food was also great which was an added plus!! very appreciative of their efforts to get my dad home!

  • Sheryl Larkin
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Our father was recently released from rehab at Hancock Park, Quincy, MA after a one week stay to get him back on his feet after a 3 week stay in the hospital (he was on the 5th floor). He received the highest quality of care from the entire staff, and I mean the entire staff from the nurses, the aides, physical therapists, the kitchen staff, and so on. I am so grateful for their compassion, the dignity they bestowed upon him, and the special attention they paid to his specific needs. They truly made a difference to our family and we're so happy our father (Jack) is on the mend. Thank you everyone who helped him return to Florida with a high quality of life enabling him to return to all his family, friends and the activities he loves. Sincerely, Sherry Larkin

  • Barbara Fitzgerald
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The nurses and aids are very nice to my father. He went from downstairs in the Allerton House to the nursing home. He has adjusted very well.

  • Pauline Samuel
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My experience at HP has been very pleasant. My mother loves HP and the staff are really invested in my mother as well. Great job HP and Thank You. My mother is very hard to please, so a big thumbs up to the staff that are patient and understanding. THANKS AGAIN!!!

  • Frankie Phares
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother is in here recovering from a surgery. As i walk down the hall i can hear the nurses saying mean things about her and other patients. They ignore her most of the time or come in with a bad attitude. I understand this feild of work can be stressful and everyone is not easy to deal with, but this is your job, take it seriously or find something else. They also charge patients $1.50 a day for tv and if you need help washing your hair they want you to go to the hair dresser downstairs and pay $20. I wouldn't recommend this place to anyone.. The hospital seems more comfortable than this place.

About Hancock Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameBane Hancock Park LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareNovember 13, 1996 (21 years)
Capacity142
Residents135
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Hancock Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Hancock Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 18, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,625 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Hancock Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.3%
98.3%
98.3%
95.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
99.1%
100.0%
99.1%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
52.5%
57.1%
55.0%
61.5%
53.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.1%
12.5%
10.5%
13.0%
21.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.3%
8.7%
9.3%
9.5%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.2%
20.6%
22.7%
19.6%
18.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.1%
4.0%
13.0%
11.8%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.2%
5.8%
7.6%
9.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.0%
2.9%
2.8%
0.9%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
3.0%
1.3%
2.7%
4.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.9%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
3.8%
3.7%
5.5%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%
2.8%
3.6%
6.2%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
4.4%
3.6%
3.4%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.3%
99.7%
99.3%
99.3%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
99.7%
99.7%
99.7%
83.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.4%
57.9%
70.2%
76.8%
55.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
45.3%
43.6%
42.5%
36.7%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
0.6%
0.7%
2.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
1.2%
0.4%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places