Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Maples Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Massachusetts
  3. Wrentham Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Alina Bilodeau Realty at Keller Williams Bilodeau
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My grandmother was here for 6 months. I don't think she liked it...I thought it was OK...my mom had a better experience there. The physical therapy is excellent. Nice staff - could be more attentive - but, I think that is true of many nursing homes/hospitals...understaffed...they do the best they can.

  • Sandra. R Mercier
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I like maples there great some of the staff the PCA 'S can get a little moody but understand it's not easy i try to make them laugh but all and all no problem ? I like it there therapist group is great ?? and their meals are good everyone has their own opinion .

  • Patricia Kinahan-Smith
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    In order to post you must put 1 star but please understand they are a minus 10. I just took my husband out of there and I would not recommend any one put someone they love there. Is was a disgrace in every way. They said my husband needs supervision to shower which he does but in 6 days they never gave him a shower so how would they know. He is diabetic and they would have killed him with insulin if he did not no to say no I don't get it. He takes medication in the pill form not insulin (they wanted to give him 4 that is right 4 injections at one time. I could go on for hours but I will say it is a disgrace. I am filing a formal complaint with the state and every agency possible. The charge nurse was the worst.

  • tanya taylor
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Highly recommended!!! I worked for this company for 5 years. This is definitely the nicest, cleanest, and respectful places I no of. I enjoyed working here so much! The staff and residents are wonderful people. This is a family owned business and they take pride in there place. I will always recommend Maples to anyone for employment and patient care! The nursing care is excellent with compationate worker's.

  • Karen McNamara
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I gave them one star because there are so many kind and caring nurses and aids there. However the management get ZERO stars. BEWARE they are putting rehab and nursing home residents on a dementia locked ward because they say they don't have beds for them. They save the "nice beds" for those with the best payor source. they used up mom's good insurance and now they refuse to put her in rehab where she belongs. Mom does NOT have dementia but she is getting physically and emotionally worse on a dementia ward.

About Maples Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameMaples Rehabilitation And Nursing Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1990 (30 years)
Capacity144
Residents135
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Maples Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Maples Rehabilitation & Nursing Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 23, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Maples Rehabilitation & Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 50min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
95.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
92.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.9%
52.6%
69.2%
61.3%
54.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.3%
10.9%
12.1%
13.0%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.9%
15.2%
17.8%
18.0%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.3%
8.0%
8.8%
7.1%
18.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.4%
14.3%
17.0%
11.6%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9%
0.9%
5.3%
2.7%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.6%
4.8%
2.9%
11.8%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5%
8.2%
5.6%
4.7%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.8%
0.0%
1.8%
1.8%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7%
2.7%
5.3%
2.7%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
1.8%
0.9%
3.5%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7%
2.0%
2.0%
1.9%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.2%
100.0%
99.0%
97.9%
79.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.3%
98.4%
98.4%
98.4%
82.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.1%
81.1%
85.2%
92.1%
61.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.6%
15.2%
21.1%
17.0%
13.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.3%
0.6%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
0.0%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places