Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Serenity Hill Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Massachusetts (MA)
  4. Wrentham
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Serenity Hill Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLong Term Centers Of Wrentham, Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1999 (18 years)
Capacity42
Residents38
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Serenity Hill Nursing Center

Serenity Hill Nursing Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 27, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$30,231 fine
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the facility is administered in an acceptable way that maintains the well-being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive the right treatment and services to residents who display physical or psychosocial problems adapting to changes in circumstances.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide bedrooms that hold no more than 4 residents per room.

July 1, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

June 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide bedrooms that hold no more than 4 residents per room.

August 4, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide bedrooms that hold no more than 4 residents per room.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Serenity Hill Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 5min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
53.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.3%
35.3%
40.0%
34.4%
21.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.4%
32.1%
24.1%
30.8%
18.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.0%
27.6%
18.8%
3.7%
14.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.1%
16.0%
5.4%
15.6%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.1%
2.9%
2.8%
5.7%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.3%
0.0%
3.6%
7.7%
4.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
5.6%
2.8%
2.9%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7%
5.9%
2.8%
2.9%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
59.1%
-
-
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
68.2%
68.2%
68.2%
83.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened