Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Future Care Chesapeake

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Arnold Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • cindy bauchspies
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    The doctors were exemplary at Future Care, and saw my loved one everyday while he was in rehab. But what impressed me most about Future Care was the cheerfulness of all the aide staff and cleaning staff. This went a long way during a difficult time, and they were always courteous and helpful.

  • Lou F
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I think this place is nice. I love the people that are working in here. The food is really nice because its cooked in house. I love waking up and getting ready and going to the social work office. They do my nails here and i like it. I love everything about this place.

  • John E
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    The Nurses, Geriatric Nursing Assistants, Physical and Occupational therapists', Doctors, Janitorial Staff and Room Cleaning Staff do an outstanding job and go Above and Beyond the Call of Duty in performing their tasks. When I first arrived here I could only move the big toe on my right foot due to a surgical issue I had. On my first day in therapy I was advised I had a attitude problem in more or less words from a occupational therapist. She was absolutely right in her assessment of me and put me in my place right off the bat which I needed. I had to slow down and listen to them exactly so I can get to the point where I am now walking and climbing stairs. Without their kind help, their guidance, and assistance I would not be where I am today. Thank you Susan and thank all of you for putting me where I am, ready to go home in 8 days. Thank you Susan for your guidance an honest assessment of me. You probably saw that Navy can do anything attitude right off the bat and set me straight. I would like to thank all the therapist both physical and occupational for their excellent work we did together. I was a little depressed when I first arrived here but I will be leaving with a very positive attitude since I can walk and climb stairs and take a shower on my own. Again thanks to their call to duty for their patients most if not all patients leave here able to take care of themselves walk stairs and walk a mile in their shoes. Thank you all and you all deserve a Bravo Zulu which in Navy terminology means job well done. The food is nutritious but lacks flavor due to some of the constraints on people's diets, no salt no other ingredients which I totally understand. My biggest pet peeve is the vegetables are always overcooked to the point of being soft which I also understand because most of the elderly people here can't. chew to well or don't have teeth. I just bear with it put my garlic salt and some lemon juice and olive oil which my wife brings me to put on my vegetables. The administrative staff here are all very professional and take pride in the work they do in helping all the patients both permanent and temporary. The recreation department does an excellent job in bringing in Talent to perform for the patients and for special occasions such as Veterans Day of which I participated with a number of other Veterans. It was a wonderful affair with music Color Guard and cake afterward. For me it is amazing to see the care, concern, and love all the staff put into the care of the patients. I would highly recommend. Chesapeake Future Care Rehabilitation Facility to anyone who wants to have a loved one come here for rehabilitation or if the issue is that severe and if they need round-the-clock care as a permanent residents. Sincerely, a very pleased patient leaving here walking, climbing stairs and showering by myself Great job future Care, Bravo Zulu!!!!

  • Ted N
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I thank FutureCare Chesapeake for being an instrumental part in my recovery. I am impressed with your strong leadership and cheerful attitude of many of your staff. I have never seen a beautiful teamwork like you have with a cheerful and friendly attitude in all departments.

  • johnny king
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Everybody is really great here, and I think they care from the bottom of their hearts. Everyone likes my sense of humor as much as I enjoy kidding around. The nursing staff is excellent as a whole, they explain my medications to me before I take it. They are knowledgeable about my care. The Therapy department as a whole are great too! Rob is my Physical Therapist and I think he is great.Beth Bender is easy to talk to and she is great as well. I noticed they offered activities for the residence at Future Care, although I didn't participate I enjoyed watching other patients attend and have fun as they reap their rewards with enjoyment. I would like to recommend Future Care as a place to have your dignity while you are recovering from your life situation.

About Future Care Chesapeake

General Information

Legal Business NameBay Manor Nursing Home, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 11, 1989 (31 years)
Capacity154
Residents145
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Future Care Chesapeake

Future Care Chesapeake was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 19, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for each resident in a way that maintains or improves their quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Future Care Chesapeake require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.1%
96.2%
96.2%
96.2%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.9%
89.4%
91.0%
89.5%
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
54.3%
52.4%
74.4%
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.2%
19.3%
16.5%
20.0%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.4%
29.2%
23.3%
17.5%
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.5%
14.4%
13.7%
15.6%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.3%
21.2%
19.0%
16.2%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7%
5.8%
10.7%
4.1%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2%
6.6%
10.4%
6.9%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2%
16.2%
11.4%
6.9%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
17.4%
5.9%
1.1%
0.0%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.2%
8.8%
6.1%
8.4%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1%
4.3%
2.0%
4.2%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
0.7%
0.0%
0.6%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

70.9%
87.5%
87.6%
74.3%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.1%
87.8%
87.8%
87.8%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.5%
67.6%
71.7%
66.7%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.7%
2.2%
5.1%
6.5%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
1.4%
2.6%
4.2%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
0.8%
1.4%
0.7%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places