Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St. Elizabeth Rehab. & Nsg. Ce

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Baltimore Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Alexander Smith
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    The nursing care that has been given to my mother-in-law is deplorable and nothing short of criminal. The medical care was so bad that my mother-in-law developed bed sores that went down to the bone with out any medical attention. It was only after her oldest daughter threatened to take pictures and legal action before this facility's medical staff reacted. My mother-in-law is currently in St. Agnes Hospital with a worse condition (bed sore) that has reached the bone again, along with pneumonia. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE WOULD I RECOMMENDED ANYONE SENDING A LOVED ONE TO THIS FACILITY FOR TREATMENT!!!

  • Frank Fillmore
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother is an 80 year old resident of the Neighborhoods at St. Elizabeth. She has been diagnosed with severe cognitive impairment (dementia). She has been at St. Elizabeth for almost 2 years. In that time she has gained almost 50% of her previous body weight. She has been engaged in multiple enrichment programs including live music, annual birthday parties, daily Mass, and - of course - bingo. The staff know and greet her by name. The pastoral care staff continue to help my mother adjust. I visited several other nursing home facilities when searching for a place for my mother. St. Elizabeth is significantly better than anyplace else I toured. The patience and dedication of the men and women who work there is amazing.

  • Meghan Cosgrove
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    As the Assistant Principal at Holy Angels Catholic School, I have had the opportunity of building a great partnership with the staff and residents of St. Elizabeth's. Each week, our students visit with the residents to build relationships and for community service. The staff welcomes our children warmly and provides an opportunity for our students to grow. We look forward to continuing this partnership in the years ahead. Thank you for all that you do for the residents and our students at Holy Angels.

  • Edward Holloway
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother has been as Saint Elizabeth for the past 2 years. The staff has been professional, the management has been courteous and helpful under direction of Raleigh the director. I have been quite satisfied with the care, help and condition of my mother. I would recommend Saint Elizabeth to anyone who is Seeking a place for their elderly ones that needs cute Medical Care and attention.

  • Bradley Livingston
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Unprofessional business and lazy workers there

About St. Elizabeth Rehab. & Nsg. Ce

General Information

Legal Business NameJenkins Memorial Nursing Home Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 24, 1967 ()
Capacity162
Residents154
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St. Elizabeth Rehab. & Nsg. Ce

St. Elizabeth Rehab. & Nsg. Ce was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 10, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaintProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

March 2, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$116,870 fine
GFewActual HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision and hearing.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

October 31, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St. Elizabeth Rehab. & Nsg. Ce require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.8%
84.7%
84.7%
84.7%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.5%
85.3%
85.4%
74.2%
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
53.6%
69.7%
50.0%
55.2%
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.7%
20.6%
14.0%
17.4%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
32.3%
19.7%
26.2%
31.5%
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.0%
11.9%
12.5%
12.4%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.6%
20.9%
15.3%
28.4%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.2%
4.2%
8.9%
1.2%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
4.4%
1.9%
2.0%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.4%
7.9%
1.7%
1.7%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.1%
4.7%
5.7%
1.6%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1%
4.7%
4.9%
3.2%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.6%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

77.2%
81.3%
86.0%
76.3%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.9%
81.3%
81.3%
81.3%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.1%
70.7%
55.2%
64.5%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.9%
8.6%
6.0%
2.3%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.7%
2.1%
1.5%
0.8%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
1.1%
1.5%
1.4%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places