Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Summit Park Health And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Maryland (MD)
  4. Catonsville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My mother was there one night called home crying they wouldn't give her her meds went to visit soon as you walked 8n the plac3d stank the closer i got to her room it was worst. Just today it took 50 minutes for someone to come and change her. Its been taking them 20 to 45 min for them to changes her her lights would stay blanking for at 30 minutes before anybody would come in to see if she is ok. She scared to day anything afraid they will treat her worst and the food is worst then trash.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Great place that work

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Summit Park Health And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameSsc Catonsville Operating Company LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 21, 1999 (18 years)
Capacity143
Residents114
Percent Occupied80%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Summit Park Health And Rehabilitation Center

Summit Park Health And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 9, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

July 9, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.

May 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Summit Park Health And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 40min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.1%
97.1%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.0%
67.7%
83.3%
71.0%
58.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.6%
18.6%
22.5%
26.7%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
34.1%
29.8%
16.8%
36.6%
21.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.6%
7.9%
8.8%
7.7%
13.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8%
14.4%
17.8%
21.3%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.0%
1.9%
12.1%
13.4%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9%
3.0%
2.9%
3.0%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5%
13.8%
14.9%
19.8%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.1%
1.1%
2.0%
3.2%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
4.0%
1.9%
1.0%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
2.0%
2.9%
1.9%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
0.8%
1.3%
0.6%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.5%
97.1%
86.5%
84.4%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.9%
89.7%
89.7%
89.7%
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.7%
61.3%
71.7%
70.0%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.0%
7.8%
8.8%
18.2%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
1.0%
0.9%
0.9%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
1.4%
1.0%
1.1%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places