Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Crofton Convalescent Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Crofton Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Vicki K
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    I found the staff was very kind and professional . My first time in rehab and I felt they went over and above to make me feel comfortable. The meals were good, and my preferences were noted. There were a couple meals that were not appealing, and in those cases, they actually made something else just for me, I was impressed by the careful monitoring of my progress and I really felt cared for. Kudos to everyone .

  • Peter Yiengst
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Yesterday there was a 40 years Anniversary Walkway dedication at Hospice of the Chesapeake where my wife spent her last week six months ago. It just reminded me that this review needed to be posted. She was here for 3 months and the caring attitude and care was far beyond what we expected. We did not find one nasty not caring member of the staff in her whole time here. It is hard to believe how well she was treated after being in two other facilities less than 10 miles from here where half of the staff and managers were not very caring to just nasty. Nobody wants to be in a nursing home but this one is exceptionally kind.

  • TLO O
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Best Rehab in Anne Arundel County. These facilities are under an amazing amount of overisght by Medicare and state agencies. Crofton has consistently provided the best possible care possible in a very demanding environment. If you are unsure, go visit some other options, then make a decision.

  • Jean Little
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    I feel so fortunate to have one of the best skilled nursing facilities in my own community. My mom has been there several times for subacute rehab. My uncle was there for the same. I now have a challenging family member in long term care. None of these places are perfect but this is by far the best. Employees are professionally dressed, have strong work ethic and work hard to meet families special needs. They have gone above and beyond to meet her dietary requests. It is clean and I never notice odors described by other posters. It helps if you stay involved as much as possible. You know your family members better than they do. Some things required a lot of discussion and follow up but that is the way it is.

  • Janice Kim
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My mother, Jai Seong Cho Hewick, is there now recovering from a stroke and the nurses and staff have been LOVELY! I met everyone (all of her attending nurses, head physician, psychologist, social work officer, etc.) on my first weekday visiting her. They seemed informed, highly competent, caring, capable, and communicative! I've been and remain anxious about her recovery but find reassurance in this facility!

About Crofton Convalescent Center

General Information

Legal Business NameCrofton Convalescent Center, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1980 (40 years)
Capacity180
Residents153
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Crofton Convalescent Center

Crofton Convalescent Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Crofton Convalescent Center has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Crofton Convalescent Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 60min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.8%
95.0%
95.0%
95.0%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.9%
98.9%
97.9%
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
82.6%
-
92.3%
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.8%
16.9%
17.9%
15.3%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.1%
36.2%
23.8%
18.8%
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.5%
5.4%
6.5%
6.4%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.8%
24.7%
13.0%
17.3%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.0%
14.0%
9.1%
2.5%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2%
12.3%
15.6%
6.5%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.9%
7.7%
7.7%
8.7%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.9%
3.5%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
7.4%
3.3%
6.4%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.1%
1.1%
3.2%
2.1%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.3%
95.0%
95.7%
96.9%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.5%
93.9%
93.9%
93.9%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.4%
71.0%
72.9%
75.6%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
27.2%
24.8%
21.7%
21.6%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
1.0%
1.7%
2.6%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
2.9%
1.5%
0.9%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places