Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Homewood At Crumland Farms

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Frederick Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Jason P
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Dont do it if you have ANY other choice. This place makes a motel 6 look like the Hyatt. Sort of reasonably clean for the hotel equivalent of a sketchy truck stop. If you're staying in the winter you'll probably want to bring a jacket and a sleeping bag the heaters aren't much better than a tepid bath. If you're in a pinch than you can roll the dice but be prepared for an...interesting experience.

  • Ann Wendt
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This is the best retirement community I have ever seen. There is nothing like it near me in Georgia. I am so glad my dad lives here now - he really enjoys it too! The staff is friendly, the dining room serves great food, and the facilities are welcoming, well appointed and always lots to do. It is very comforting to me that if dad ever needs more specialized care, he doesn't have to go to another facility. If there was a Homewood near me i would sign up right now! I think as far as cost goes, THEY GET IT! Who wants to 'buy' into a retirement community when you will have to sell it to get the money back, if you even can. Renting is definitely the way to go!

  • PerSueTheDream .
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This not a hotel, it's a retirement "community". There are 3 levels of care. Mist residents are living independently, there is also a small assisted living wing, and another area for terminal and seriously ill residents. It does look like a hotel, quite nice inside, but it's still an old folks home. For the price, you could check into the Ritz and order room service all day! They cater and market to "young" seniors - oh there are so many trips and games and booze. And when the time comes and you aren't able to keep up you receive so so care at 4x the price you came in on. This is suppose to be a non-profit. Ha ha. Somebody's wallowing in it.

  • sue marks
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Great facility overall!!! Food amazing...staff awesome

  • Anna Lee Williams, Realtor
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Very high level of culture and community involvement. Lovely people living and working here! Thank you for having my daughter give a classical piano performance.

About Homewood At Crumland Farms

General Information

Legal Business NameHomewood At Frederick Md, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 4, 1993 (27 years)
Capacity117
Residents106
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Homewood At Crumland Farms

Homewood At Crumland Farms was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 8, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Homewood At Crumland Farms require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.2%
95.6%
95.6%
95.6%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.0%
72.9%
58.7%
67.4%
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.7%
18.0%
21.3%
21.8%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.9%
16.1%
20.0%
13.5%
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.5%
12.4%
9.0%
9.4%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.2%
19.6%
12.2%
16.2%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.9%
5.8%
6.1%
4.3%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5%
3.3%
0.0%
2.4%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
1.7%
1.0%
2.1%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
1.0%
5.6%
0.0%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
1.9%
3.0%
3.2%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
4.8%
5.0%
3.1%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
0.7%
1.6%
0.9%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.2%
95.7%
97.2%
92.6%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.0%
72.1%
72.1%
72.1%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.3%
92.4%
95.3%
88.5%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.0%
4.9%
3.4%
4.9%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
1.2%
2.3%
1.5%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places