Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Chesapeake Shores

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Maryland (MD)
  4. Lexington Park
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My mom is a resident and has adapted very well. The staff seems to be great and when I come visit, she is always doing an activity. This is exactly what I had hoped for. They have lovely patios and a resident dog that brightens the resident's days! They are even taking my mom on a vacation to Florida and she is super excited, something I haven't seen since 2014 when she first got sick!!! I would highly recommend Chesapeake Shores for your loved one.

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    During an illness of my father , he was placed into Rehabilitation and I worked with the staff and he was released a little early in my opinion because of insurance reasons. I can honestly say the staff agreed . With in one month my father had a relapse, after being in the hospital for a short time he had to go back to Rehabilitation again at this facility. Once again I worked with the staff and my father has now been 2 years free and clear of health issues and maintaining a normal standard of living thanks to the help of this Rehabilitation Center. Sometimes you can't just rely on a rehabilitation center but you have to be active in helping your loved one to be rehabilitated. We need to take responsibility for our elderly we can't just rely on a rehabilitation center

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    They take good care of my Aunt with her speech and exercise, she is able to help herself more and more. She love living there.

  • ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    Worse nursing home I have seen. How this place stays open is beyond me.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

About Chesapeake Shores

General Information

Legal Business NameLp Lexington Park LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1982 (35 years)
Capacity117
Residents105
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Chesapeake Shores

Chesapeake Shores
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 18, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 1, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

June 29, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaintProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Chesapeake Shores require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.2%
97.0%
97.0%
97.0%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.1%
91.3%
95.6%
91.6%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
54.8%
53.6%
34.5%
40.0%
58.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.2%
18.7%
16.9%
17.2%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.4%
17.5%
6.9%
23.1%
21.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.7%
28.9%
26.2%
26.5%
13.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5%
15.9%
17.9%
13.1%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.2%
8.1%
7.1%
3.4%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.6%
7.1%
10.7%
1.1%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5%
5.8%
8.7%
9.3%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.5%
6.3%
0.0%
1.2%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2%
6.7%
3.4%
6.3%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
3.3%
1.1%
1.1%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
4.2%
3.5%
3.5%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

55.7%
54.1%
53.2%
52.7%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.7%
57.8%
57.8%
57.8%
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.0%
70.8%
71.3%
70.1%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
22.0%
25.6%
25.9%
30.9%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
0.0%
1.5%
1.6%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places