Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Powerback Rehabilitation

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Lutherville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • krista francus
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I was very nervous for my mother to go into a rehab but we made the right decision. Therapy helped her so much ! Every nurse , aide and doctor were wonderful. The food was also amazing. She looked forward to her meals everyday. Thanks Powerback for helping my mom!

  • LESLIE DOSTER
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I had to make the decision for rehabilitation very quickly. I picked PowerBack because it was close to my home and also they have private rooms with no extra fees. The staff is friendly and helpful for the most part but you definitely need to have an advocate to watch over your needs. The food was good and you could ask for special things. If they had it you got it. There were plenty of places to eat with friends and family if you don't want to eat in your room. They have a hair salon if you don't want to do your own hair. There are activities that are planned for each day. The P/T and the O/T departments are very good. They got me started slowly but active and worked with me so that I was doing things I had done before surgery. Corey and Zara were wonderful, patient and caring about my other medical needs that were related to my hip surgery. Lisa and the aides on the first floor were great. Everything together is why I gave them four stars for my whole experience. I never was in rehabilitation before and hope never to go back but if I have to I would come back here in a heart beat.

  • Barry Bloomfield
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    Reviewed nine local Rehabilitation Facilities in the local area. PowerBack Rehabilitation located at 515 Brightfield Road, Lutherville MD was the last facility reviewed and my First Choice. After three weeks can definitely say I made the correct decision for my Mon. Best Rehabilitation Facility in the area!

  • Peggy Thomas
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    "Hands on" staff leaves a lot to be desired. Had to "fight" to get things ( meds, food, personal care) in order. Things did pick up after a few days. In general people are friendly but I feel they need more help.

  • Rachel kells
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    As a former employee; powerback is beautiful on the in side and out very clean and some of the staff are very nice. The only thing i would say is that team work is not there in some area's and that's what drive a booming business if you get someone new don't make them feel unwanted or not as special as the older employees there, There part is just as important as the rolls of everyone employed by powerback...

About Powerback Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business Name515 Brightfield Road Operations LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 22, 1990 (29 years)
Capacity110
Residents68
Percent Occupied62%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Powerback Rehabilitation

Powerback Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 11, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

January 15, 2016 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,088 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Powerback Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 45min
1hr 30min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 40min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

63.1%
77.0%
79.9%
69.8%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.4%
81.8%
81.8%
81.8%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
51.4%
57.1%
65.6%
74.6%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.1%
7.8%
6.8%
8.9%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
0.9%
0.5%
0.2%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.5%
0.5%
0.3%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places