Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Powerback Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Maryland (MD)
  4. Lutherville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    I visited a dear friend at this facility today. As soon as my husband and I walked into the door, we noticed the "nursing home smell" and couldn't get over the clutter that seemed to be everywhere. Hard to navigate through the hallways because of misc items that were either in use or not in use and sitting in the center of the hallways. Common areas appeared to have not been cleaned and in the dining room, several tables had not been cleared after use. The patient room is too small and cramped to be a proper room used for rehabilitation. These types of facilities are to be used as a step between hospital stays and going home. There is no way that I could see my friend being able to get out of her bed and into the wheelchair without having to knock out a wall or two. No shower in the bathroom. The unit was not even conducive for anyone to wheel themselves around or practice ambulation with their walkers. The roommate put her call bell on and no one answered it for almost 10 minutes and when the aide finally walked into the room, she was gruff and irritable to the point of seeming accusatory. The patient politely asked for medication for nausea and the aide left. No one came to check her for over an hour. Makes one wonder if the nurse ever got the message that she had a patient who was feeling ill. Medication finally was administered 1 1/2 hours after the initial request. No apology for the delay was offered and no one even bothered to ask her how she was feeling or get close enough to her to touch her. Meanwhile, during all of this time, staff was in the hallway laughing and joking as if they had not a care in the world. I hope and pray that my friend is able to go home in the next few days before her condition worsens. I would not advise anyone to allow their loved ones to be admitted to this facility. I would spread the word to all of the Case Managers in the area hospitals who would be using this place to put their rehab patients. I was thoroughly disgusted. I hated to even put one star in my review---it doesn't even deserve that. I am a retired BSN, RN, CCM and former patient at a rehabilitation facility that knew what they are supposed to do. Genesis, you should be very ashamed.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Location is nice but as you enter inside the facility you smell the nasty oder (smell like dead rat or pee), the hallway carpet is filled with spots and dirty. Service is slow. We only stay two nights and one day. Then transferred to another facility. Please visit this facility before you make a decision .

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    I had high hopes for this facility being as though a family member had been here earlier in the year and recommended the place. However, the care was below standard my loved one ended up with a severe infection. Her wound was not properly cared for. It was so bad that they had to transport her to the hospital where she hasbeen for 2 months, due to the severe infection. To top it all off her cell phone and tablet were stolen. I would not recommend this facility to anyone.

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    As a former patient I would not recommend this facility. They do not care for patients. They dispensed my medication late every single day. Trying to find the nurse to dispense the medication was the most difficult...They are poorly staffed and poorly trained to handle the various levels of care. I did physical therapy one day and I heard several of the therapists complaining about their supervisor in front of clients. My breakfast, lunch, and dinner orders that were placed were incorrect. There is nothing that I can say positive about this facility. To add insult to injury, I was forced to move rooms after I refused. Not cool. I will be writing to the corporate office.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Horrible facility. This place is not staffed properly. My mother went there after hip surgery and the first night she was not checked on for over 12 hours when she was supposed to be getting medication every 4 hours. The staff ignored her call bell and turned it off multiple times without checking on her. She ended up yelling for help and no one came to her aid. She had to call me to come to the facility in the middle of the night to help her. I am absolutely appalled by this facility and we are in the process of moving her to another facility. The next day it took over 45 min for someone to come help her go to the bathroom and the only reason it didn't take longer was because I got up to find someone. I am a nurse and I know what it takes and no patient she ever be ignored. Do not send your loved ones to this place!

About Powerback Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business Name515 Brightfield Road Operations LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 22, 1990 (27 years)
Capacity110
Residents68
Percent Occupied62%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Powerback Rehabilitation

Powerback Rehabilitation
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 15, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,088 fine

December 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

October 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintGive each resident enough fluids to keep them healthy and prevent dehydration.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Powerback Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 45min
1hr 30min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 40min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
58.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
21.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
13.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

83.3%
76.3%
68.9%
59.1%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.2%
75.4%
75.4%
75.4%
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.9%
62.2%
57.8%
51.7%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
12.5%
11.3%
8.2%
5.4%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
1.0%
1.4%
1.6%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.4%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places