Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Aurora Senior Living Of Manokin, LLC

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Princess Anne Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cheriton Mayor
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My personal opinion: Do not place your parent or loved one in this Rehabilitation Facility!! The whole experience for our family was a nightmare in my opinion. Some Simply do not care about the patients personal needs, and make it very clear they don't want patients to have a voice or a choice about anything. Don't ask for an extra blanket or a CLEAN glass of water; that's an inconvenience to certain staff. If your on a special diet or want to continue with normal daily vitamins... forget about it. Don't ask why you are not getting the correct Food/Diet/Medicine or you will be shunned. There were handful of nice and caring staff members, but not enough to monitor the 24/7 care needed by most patients. Unfortunately the bad apples spoil the whole experience for intelligent, alert patients and also their guests. So in closing, if your loved one is not in a coma, it's possible you will not have a great experience at this facility either. In my opinion, they prefer comatose patients that don't speak and need little to no attention!!

  • 7858010 0133939
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    Aurora senior living is a newly renovated facility that offers 24 hour assistance to seniors who can not afford in home care. Their are a wide range of activities for their guest from bingo to movies. Friendly professional staff

  • Ephaliena Fields
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Do not put your mother's in this nursing home!!!! The CNA GNA, CMA & nurses simply do not care about your loved ones!!! ****WARNING********

  • William Reilly
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My wife was there for a week,the worse care, awful place

  • Olive Finney
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Awful experience!

About Aurora Senior Living Of Manokin, LLC

General Information

Legal Business NameAurora Senior Living Of Manokin, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 11, 1988 (31 years)
Capacity135
Residents110
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Aurora Senior Living Of Manokin, LLC

Aurora Senior Living Of Manokin, LLC was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 28, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

April 19, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Aurora Senior Living Of Manokin, LLC require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.2%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.3%
56.1%
73.3%
56.8%
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
21.2%
20.8%
20.6%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
30.4%
45.6%
29.6%
29.1%
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.5%
13.9%
16.3%
13.3%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.8%
26.7%
36.7%
24.2%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.3%
10.8%
8.2%
11.3%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9%
0.9%
0.0%
0.9%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
4.9%
5.1%
1.2%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
9.5%
6.7%
6.0%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.9%
3.7%
2.9%
2.8%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8%
5.6%
4.8%
2.8%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
2.9%
0.7%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

90.2%
97.3%
93.9%
94.8%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.0%
95.9%
95.9%
95.9%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.3%
82.2%
74.3%
71.3%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
6.7%
3.8%
1.8%
1.8%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.7%
7.7%
1.8%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places