Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Future Care Old Court

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Maryland (MD)
  4. Randallstown
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Vicky Morgan
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Great Experience for my aunt! I have not seen her this happy in a very long time. Food is great and staff really shows they care.

  • Jessica Pool
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    This is a really nice place. we didn't end up coming here but it would be my 1st choice for any of my parents.

  • Melissa Davis
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Reported to staff an incident of inappropriate conduct of care for my family member. Instead of showing concern to my complaint I received the run around. First was the delay in getting me a form to file the complaint then, then the nurse who is supposed to be conducting the investigation told me she doesn't speak English well. I have yet to get any information on the investigation to the mishandling of the patient. What I have received is a call claiming the week prior, my family member kicked the staff, I advised they care givers that this patient has a medical diagnosis of Dementia and what I need to know is what are the policies and procedures that Future Care implements in dealing with patients that can't fend for themselves. I have yet to receive any feedback on this matter.

  • marty flowers
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    This facility is the WORST in regards to the care I am receiving. A lot of the staff are rude, I have been left sitting on bedpans for 30 to 40 mins. Small things like getting ice can take over an hour. Combine this with the fact that most of the staff don't speak very good English and you have the recipe for poor customer service. I worked in one of the local prisons, and the inmates were treated with more dignity and respect

  • Harsh Dand
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Most helpful people on the call. It's always greatful to talk with Kathy from Human Resource's. Keep it up.... - Happy

About Future Care Old Court

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareJune 26, 1979 (38 years)
Capacity141
Residents131
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Future Care Old Court

Future Care Old Court
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 16, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

August 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

December 19, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain laboratory services only when ordered by the attending physician.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Future Care Old Court require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 40min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.2%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.6%
76.9%
73.1%
79.4%
58.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.8%
10.0%
9.9%
13.9%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.8%
29.9%
19.3%
18.6%
21.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.9%
12.0%
9.8%
5.3%
13.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.0%
28.7%
29.5%
22.6%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.6%
8.0%
3.8%
5.7%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.5%
8.8%
9.7%
7.4%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6%
8.7%
11.2%
8.6%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.1%
5.4%
7.5%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8%
7.1%
4.0%
3.8%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7%
0.8%
0.6%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

76.3%
88.1%
89.4%
87.1%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.2%
88.6%
88.6%
88.6%
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.9%
49.7%
49.9%
48.5%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.3%
6.9%
2.1%
2.3%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.5%
1.4%
2.3%
3.2%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5%
3.4%
2.5%
1.8%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places