Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Future Care Cherrywood

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Reisterstown Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Jennifer Broadwater
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I went to see my neighbor today 9/7/19. It was my first time there. The staff greeted me as I entered the door. Everyone that I encountered were very nice. And everything was also very clean ! Seems to be a very nice Rehab Center!

  • Pampered and Nailed
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Have been calling admissions for 2 weeks with no answer or returned call. Seriously? Love the professionalism. If you cant even return a call why would I be under the impression you can take care of a patient?

  • Scott Pockerian
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    When i came to the facility for the first time there was this really nice young lady who escorted me form the reception area all the way to my friends room upstairs. My review may be somewhat biased based on my first impression but that's all it takes sometimes. When i came the other day they had some entertainer playing music and it was packed with residents. If it wasn't free i might have paid a few bucks to watch it was so good.

  • Shannon Kennedy
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    The team is a great! Futurecare cherrywood always has a lot got going on for the residents. The facility is beautiful and very clean. Go take a tour you will not be disappointed.

  • Shirley Stephenson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Living here these past 2 years has been a very good and nurturing experience for me. I participate in Bingo regularly, and love it. The residents are very friendly and the staff is absolutely beautiful, and so accommodating as well. I would recommend anyone who needs this type of care to look into Future Care at Cherrywood. Not only is the food good, but this is one of the cleanest and most well kept facilities that I've ever seen.

About Future Care Cherrywood

General Information

Legal Business NameCherrywood Limited Partnership
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 1, 1989 (31 years)
Capacity167
Residents153
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Future Care Cherrywood

Future Care Cherrywood was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 29, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionTell the resident or the residents representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the residents bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

May 18, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Future Care Cherrywood require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.4%
99.2%
99.2%
100.0%
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.0%
67.6%
73.3%
76.0%
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.6%
19.0%
21.6%
21.6%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.2%
17.8%
20.7%
12.3%
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.0%
4.9%
4.0%
3.2%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.5%
13.5%
10.0%
13.7%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.7%
6.3%
6.9%
11.5%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
2.6%
2.7%
1.9%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.8%
5.2%
7.8%
4.3%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.8%
6.5%
6.7%
7.8%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
1.6%
2.3%
1.5%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
1.6%
1.5%
0.8%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
1.5%
0.5%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.8%
90.6%
96.8%
96.2%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.0%
91.5%
91.5%
91.5%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.9%
60.3%
58.9%
60.9%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.1%
16.0%
16.9%
25.6%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.7%
0.0%
1.3%
1.3%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.8%
0.9%
1.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places