Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Future Care Cherrywood

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Maryland (MD)
  4. Reisterstown
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I've worked at FutureCare for over 3 years, and I can honestly say I love my job. We have a lot of great employees at Cherrywood. We work together as a team to make sure the patients and residents are number one priority. Healthcare is one of the toughest fields to work in, but is by far the most rewarding. I am grateful to work at a great building.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    The administrator here at Cherrywood is always helpful and smiling. He and the rest of the staff truly cares for each individual who comes through the doors as family.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Vickie and I would like to take a moment to express our gratitude and appreciation for all of the outstanding care and attention that my mother, Bunny Kravitz is receiving from the administration and support staff of the FutureCare Cherrywood facility. A little over a year ago, when we first were referred and introduced to FutureCare, we could not have envisioned that we were getting the very best care and attentiveness that any patient or client could expect to receive. Please, take a moment and share this complementary expression of our sincere gratitude and appreciation for the excellent care that our mother is receiving. Thanks again! Regards, Neil & Vickie Kravitz

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I have known this Administrator for a long time and he runs a superb building. You would not know you are in a Nursing Home by just walking in there and looking around. Keep up the fabulous work! (Also, the new sign they got is a lot easier to notice at night and I don't accidently miss it anymore)

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My father was taken to Future Care Reisterstown after having his toes amputated due to diabetic ulcers. For the three months he was in Future Care, I tried to tell the nurses that he was allergic to Morphine. They continued to give this drug to him along with other pain killers and antibiotics which made him sick. Over the course of his stay at Future Care, he lost over 8 pounds because he couldn't eat due to nausea over the medications. Their solution - give him more pills to combat the nausea. Did they take him off the Morphine? NO. It only after 3 days later he was taken off of it and he still continued to get sick. When I approached the one nurse, he acted like I didn't know what I was talking about. I have lived home with my 97 and 86 year old parents all my life and have taken them to their surgeries, doctor appointments and other procedures. I know what they can take and what they can't take as far as prescriptions. The funny thing is that my mother was in Future Care for two years prior to my father's experience and she got excellent care. I don't know what has happened in the past 2/3 years, but the staff appears to not have any knowledge as to what they are doing, there are too many nurses involved in the care of the individual and you can't get any answers when having to approach the staff. Nobody knows anything and all they do is shift the information from one person to another. I can't complain about the friendliness of the staff, but the care truly is poor. I truly wish there was another health care facility within Maryland where I can put my parents for in-health care. Unfortunately, Future Care is the monopoly within Maryland and there is no other choice.

About Future Care Cherrywood

General Information

Legal Business NameCherrywood Limited Partnership
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 1, 1989 (29 years)
Capacity167
Residents157
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Future Care Cherrywood

Future Care Cherrywood
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 22, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

June 5, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Future Care Cherrywood require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 60min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.3%
98.7%
98.7%
98.7%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
97.8%
98.5%
98.5%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.9%
59.3%
75.6%
80.0%
58.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.8%
26.8%
27.3%
24.2%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.7%
27.0%
35.9%
21.0%
21.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.4%
9.7%
10.0%
8.0%
13.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8%
21.0%
19.6%
16.8%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.5%
7.7%
6.4%
1.4%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9%
10.9%
10.4%
9.2%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2%
8.8%
3.4%
6.5%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.2%
6.2%
7.4%
7.6%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.6%
2.2%
3.0%
2.3%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
1.4%
2.2%
0.8%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
0.0%
0.5%
1.6%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.0%
93.0%
96.9%
91.1%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.5%
93.0%
93.0%
93.0%
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.7%
60.1%
62.3%
62.2%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
20.5%
24.4%
23.6%
21.6%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8%
0.8%
1.6%
2.4%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
1.4%
1.2%
0.6%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places