Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Hebrew Home Of Greater Washington

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Maryland (MD)
  4. Rockville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Their interview process is just waste of your time, days, weeks and months. You will be asked to do telephone interviews, face to face interviews and will be asked to do different tests in their office which will consume two weeks and they keep calling you for different days. They will ask you to do those test even if they know they will not hire you. They will call you again and again to their office for the never ending tests even they very well know they will not hire you. If you score good or high, they are not hiring as they are looking for specific person as per their office needs. Apply if you are 50 or above as this is what their office set up needs. There is no use of face to face interviews or waste 5, 6 days on the tests, telephone interviews. Their interview process is very unstructured, They look for very specific personality as per their office set up.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I received sub-acute rehab here for 4 weeks. Not sure why Occupational and physcial therapy are not on a daily schedule for patients. The patient is not informed of when OT or PT will be performed, the therapist walks in the room and takes the patient for therapy. As with all medical facilities they are understaffed and therefore I recommend a sitter be hired for your family memeber. The techs and nursing staff are too stretched. Meals are fine but not delivered at the same time daily. Better business practices are needed in most areas. In general, I rate the Hewbrew Home Sub Acute Rehab (Wasserman Bldg.) 2-3 stars. I would not recommend this facility, try Sibley Renassaince Rehab for sub scute care.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    It is okay because they help my grandmother and she has a stroke and they have nice nurses and nice people but they should have a place for visitors to sleep at and sleep so they can be with her parents are forever as long as I want.

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

About Hebrew Home Of Greater Washington

General Information

Legal Business NameHebrew Home Of Greater Washington Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 29, 1969 ()
Capacity558
Residents496
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Hebrew Home Of Greater Washington

Hebrew Home Of Greater Washington
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 1, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

December 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.

August 25, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaintProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

February 23, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Hebrew Home Of Greater Washington require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.2%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
95.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8%
95.5%
97.0%
98.8%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.9%
61.7%
65.9%
60.7%
58.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.6%
18.5%
17.4%
17.8%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.3%
18.4%
19.4%
14.5%
21.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.3%
15.4%
11.4%
9.2%
13.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.6%
12.4%
16.0%
13.2%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3%
6.3%
5.1%
4.6%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.9%
7.3%
5.0%
6.2%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9%
6.1%
5.5%
6.4%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
12.4%
9.2%
12.2%
11.9%
4.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1%
4.5%
4.0%
1.7%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9%
3.7%
4.3%
3.4%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
2.1%
1.9%
1.1%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
1.2%
1.0%
1.2%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

90.6%
90.5%
95.0%
96.7%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.2%
92.4%
92.4%
92.4%
82.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.7%
71.8%
73.0%
79.1%
64.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.2%
16.2%
15.9%
13.1%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.5%
1.4%
0.9%
0.0%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.4%
0.5%
0.7%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places