Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Copper Ridge

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Maryland
  3. Sykesville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Becca A.
    ★★★★★ 4 weeks ago

    They provide excellent care for residents affected with mild to severe dementia and alzheimers disease. The staff are diligent and supportive. They go to extreme lengths to ensure the comfort of those they care for and the families involved.

  • Charles Schuster
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    A great memory care facility

  • Karen Bailey
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    We couldn't be happier with the care that our mother received at Copper Ridge! Every single staff member was responsive to mom's needs, kind, supportive, and went out of his or her way to help us.

  • Debbie Crossett
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    If I had a choice I would give less than one star. My loved one saw Dr. Absar at the Memory Clinic for a diagnosis. She was very good, so we decided when he needed to move to assisted living that this would be the place for him. We put him in "respite" care so that we could try him there and see how he did. He did not get much attention at all. Because he was able to do some things for himself, he was not checked on except to be told when food was ready - no one checked on him between meals. (We visited him every day) He did not get bathed, his clothes were not changed one time for 3 days in a row! Nurses and caregivers are stretched so thin that if you need to talk to someone, there is no one to be found. One hand doesn't know what the other is doing. If your loved one is at the point of needing to be dressed, put in a diaper and rolled out to be put in front of the TV for the day, then this is the place for you....otherwise, HORRIBLE CARE!! Also, they charge over $10,000 a month for this "Golden Standard" of care. DISGRACEFUL......

  • julie Wojtisek
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My mother has been a resident of Copper Ridge for over 2 years now. I can't say enough about the care she has received. The staff is wonderful and they treat her like family. Regardless of when I stop in for a visit, she is always well cared for... oftentimes in group activities...and never alone. Highly recommended.

About Copper Ridge

General Information

Legal Business NameCopper Ridge Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 18, 1994 (26 years)
Capacity66
Residents61
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsFamily
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Copper Ridge

Copper Ridge was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Maryland Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 30, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Copper Ridge require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 40min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 20min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

87.0%
98.0%
98.0%
98.0%
96.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
97.6%
93.2%
95.3%
94.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
59.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.5%
11.4%
7.5%
5.3%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.3%
13.0%
15.2%
20.7%
21.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
44.0%
40.5%
45.5%
46.5%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.2%
32.3%
14.3%
12.1%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.0%
4.9%
4.5%
4.7%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
2.7%
0.0%
7.1%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.0%
2.4%
2.3%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

81.1%
78.8%
81.0%
76.8%
83.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.1%
76.2%
76.2%
76.2%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.8%
62.3%
55.2%
47.0%
68.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.3%
6.1%
2.1%
2.0%
12.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.4%
2.7%
0.0%
2.6%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MD
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places