Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Laurels Of Bedford (The)

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Michigan (MI)
  4. Battle Creek
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Christy Daker Helton
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    The employees take really great care of the residents.

  • Melinda Eberhart
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Management was unappreciative to the hard work staff did.

  • Alexis Butler
    ★★★★★ a year ago

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 5 years ago

About Laurels Of Bedford (The)

General Information

Legal Business NameLaurel Health Care Company Of Battle Creek
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 1, 1976 (42 years)
Capacity123
Residents96
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Laurels Of Bedford (The)

Laurels Of Bedford (The)
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Michigan Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 10, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

December 10, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Provide 3 meals at regular times; 2) serve breakfast within 14 hours of dinner; and 3) offer a snack at bedtime each day.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

July 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

January 16, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

November 21, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Laurels Of Bedford (The) require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.9%
90.2%
90.2%
90.2%
92.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.3%
96.3%
100.0%
100.0%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.9%
39.3%
40.0%
41.9%
49.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.8%
18.8%
23.4%
19.1%
22.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.6%
17.4%
12.9%
3.3%
17.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.7%
14.5%
13.2%
16.7%
13.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.2%
11.1%
17.1%
7.4%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
8.0%
7.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.5%
3.8%
1.3%
1.4%
7.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.1%
10.3%
12.9%
4.2%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.3%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1%
1.3%
2.6%
1.4%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7%
6.2%
1.3%
1.4%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
0.0%
2.2%
1.8%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

67.6%
77.7%
91.4%
93.7%
80.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.9%
75.5%
75.5%
75.5%
79.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.8%
78.5%
89.1%
85.4%
70.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
15.6%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4%
1.5%
0.0%
1.4%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places