Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Laurels Of Bedford (The)

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Michigan
  3. Battle Creek Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cindy Bergeon
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    The management team, nurses, aids, and physical therapy staff couldn't have been any more caring and helpful from the moment I arrived.They made sure I had meals and snacks to my satisfaction. The nurses aids went over and beyond to make me feel at home. I could not have asked for any better treatment during my stay. There is no doubt I would choose this facility again for recovery and physical therapy if needed. I highly recommend them.

  • David Vandenburg
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    *Thumbs up* When asked if he likes it at the Laurels of Bedford, "YEAH!!!" How do you like the food and staff?" *Thumbs up* "Good", with a big smile! David really enjoys the independence he has at the Laurels of Bedford, his friends that he has made since being here, and the ability to take his breaks outside with the guys (weather permitting)!! Being able to make his own choices keeps a smile on his face!!

  • Liza Boody
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My granny was there and the staff made sure she was well taken care of. Her meals were just the way she liked them, the floors shined always, and the staff were friendly no matter where we walked. The administrator was polite and helpful. Therapy and social services met our needs while there and gave us a smooth transition home. We will be back!!!

  • Deborah Farmer
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    "I never have to worry about anything! Everybody here is friendly and helpful. I know who I can go to when I need something and I can count on them to get things done. The food and activities are great and there is always something to do! When staff care for me, they are so polite and use their manners. Travis and Valery are especially kind to me!"

  • Larry Markham
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    My stay has been GREAT!! The food and physical therapy are excellent! The environment and staff are top notch! "I have to have surgery again and I plan to come back here! I couldn't find any better care than here at the Laurels of Bedford!"

About Laurels Of Bedford (The)

General Information

Legal Business NameLaurel Health Care Company Of Battle Creek
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 1, 1976 (44 years)
Capacity123
Residents96
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Laurels Of Bedford (The)

Laurels Of Bedford (The) was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Michigan Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 15, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Provide 3 meals at regular times; 2) serve breakfast within 14 hours of dinner; and 3) offer a snack at bedtime each day.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Laurels Of Bedford (The) require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.2%
86.0%
86.0%
86.0%
92.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
96.2%
97.3%
92.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
35.9%
48.7%
38.5%
42.4%
50.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.8%
17.3%
13.9%
12.7%
22.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
8.6%
14.6%
22.8%
18.5%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.7%
19.7%
14.3%
13.3%
12.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
15.1%
7.7%
18.3%
13.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3%
2.7%
1.3%
1.4%
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.9%
-
-
-
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
2.0%
5.9%
7.7%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3%
1.3%
0.0%
2.7%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
4.0%
2.5%
2.7%
3.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.0%
95.8%
91.5%
91.7%
80.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.5%
71.8%
71.8%
71.8%
79.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.2%
76.9%
81.4%
78.3%
71.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
22.5%
15.0%
-
-
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
0.0%
1.3%
2.8%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places