Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cass County Medical Care Facil

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Michigan
  3. Cassopolis Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Howard Hall
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My father had to go to the facility for rehab after a hospital stay. I was worried that he wouldn't take it seriously and just want to get home. My father fell in love with the facility, he loves all of the staff and after a few days started going to the many activities that the facility offers. My father is old fashion, stubborn, refuses charity and set in his ways. As his release date approached he called a family meeting and said he wanted to remain at the facility due to the friendly staff. We were shocked by this decision and are working to get tings in place for him to remain at the facility. As for the staff, I'm sure they are overworked and underpaid but you won't see that in the interaction with residents I HIGHLY recommend this facility for both short term rehab and a permanent place to stay. Thanks for all your hard work!!!

  • Tawana Washington
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    They are very helpful and take great care of my aunt. Still wish they could force her to exercise.

  • Donna Hotrum
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Clean, staff is friendly, very personal and professional too!!

  • Tia Dotson
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Cass County Medical Care Facil

General Information

Legal Business NameCounty Of Cass
Ownership TypeGovernment - County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 8, 1977 (42 years)
Capacity80
Residents69
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cass County Medical Care Facil

Cass County Medical Care Facil was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Michigan Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Cass County Medical Care Facil has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cass County Medical Care Facil require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 25min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.2%
97.0%
97.0%
97.0%
92.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
40.9%
40.9%
50.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.9%
21.9%
22.1%
20.0%
22.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.7%
28.1%
24.4%
29.3%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.1%
9.8%
10.4%
12.5%
12.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.9%
27.0%
13.2%
12.3%
13.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.0%
1.6%
3.0%
0.0%
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1%
5.2%
3.2%
3.4%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.1%
4.3%
3.7%
5.3%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.0%
4.8%
9.1%
9.1%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
1.5%
2.9%
3.0%
3.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1%
4.3%
2.6%
3.6%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.9%
98.3%
94.3%
96.1%
80.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.8%
93.2%
93.2%
93.2%
79.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.9%
60.5%
50.4%
65.4%
71.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
12.8%
19.6%
27.7%
20.5%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places