Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regency At Grand Blanc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Michigan
  3. Grand Blanc Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lakiesha McDonald's
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Management Is Very Unprofessional, I've Seen Them Treat Their Staff Very poorly. My Grandmother Was there For Three Months But Only Got Washed up A couple Times And showered TWICE I wouldn't Recommend This Place To My Dog Very Horrible. The Food Made My granny sick She Said the food Tasted As it was Old or had been sitting out over night. My Granny called home crying numerous of time sayin her call light have been on and no one ever came even if they did it would be an excuse of it being short staffed or they had a lot of residents to take care of. This place would never get any more of my MONEY

  • Lonn Palmer
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    I think my mother is in good hands, all who work there try very hard to make things nice for those seniors who live there.

  • Christine Welling
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    The truth is no family wants their loved ones away from home, especially as their needs become more intense and demanding. We couldn't have been more blessed than to have the care for our mom housed at Regency. They encompass family, care, compassion and their entire staff from culinary, housekeeping to medical care are passionate about each and every individual need. They make it appoint to be an extended family whether your family needs are short term or long term. Thank you, Regency, for wrapping your arms around our mom and taking such great care of her and all of us. We'll forever be grateful.

  • Sandy Mitchell
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My mother was there for a few weeks after a fall at home. They took really good care of her. The staff was nice and the food was good. She really liked her therapy sessions they were very informative and helped me learn a few things to take her home.

  • Cynthia Swanson
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My mother received excellent care at Regency, the therapy team is outstanding! Not only is she back home her quality of life is back to normal. She was unsure about going to rehab after her stroke, but she found it to be a great decision after settling in, being able to enjoy all the amenities, getting to know her therapist and putting her trust in her caregivers. Also, I found the Social workers to be very knowledgeable which helped us with Mom's transition back home, they were able to set her homecare, appointments and out patient therapy when she went home. A huge thank you to Regency for all your help during such a stressful time in my life!

About Regency At Grand Blanc

General Information

Legal Business NameGrand Blanc Care Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 26, 2013 (7 years)
Capacity138
Residents126
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regency At Grand Blanc

Regency At Grand Blanc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Michigan Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 30, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regency At Grand Blanc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 35min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

72.7%
73.1%
73.1%
73.1%
92.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.5%
90.9%
90.0%
92.2%
92.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
44.0%
65.0%
51.9%
46.4%
50.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.0%
34.9%
29.2%
35.4%
22.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.7%
24.9%
6.7%
17.4%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.3%
7.0%
6.4%
6.5%
12.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.9%
11.6%
14.6%
16.7%
13.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.3%
9.5%
6.4%
7.8%
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
28.6%
18.6%
19.8%
20.8%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.8%
10.0%
9.4%
2.7%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.2%
2.3%
2.1%
2.1%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.1%
4.8%
2.1%
5.9%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
9.1%
6.0%
7.8%
3.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
1.3%
0.0%
3.2%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

43.6%
55.0%
75.7%
93.0%
80.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.0%
44.6%
44.6%
44.6%
79.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.0%
87.9%
92.0%
89.4%
71.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
28.0%
27.8%
30.8%
31.4%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
0.5%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
1.2%
0.7%
1.2%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places