Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regency At Grand Blanc

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Michigan (MI)
  4. Grand Blanc
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    The only good thing about this place is that the grounds are beautiful and the therapy room is nice. All public areas are beautiful, however, don't let it deceive you into thinking that the care, food, service or anything else about the place rate at all. Waiting well over an hour to use the restroom and then send another team in to take care of the patient. The nurses aides seem too busy talking about their boyfriends instead of patient care. The people that are there need help because they are hurting. They are communicating more on cell phones than meeting the patients needs. The rooms are not cleaned regularly and the food was adequate. My Father had a very difficult and unhappy, uncomfortable stay. We would not recommend this at all.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    The food is terrible ,the dinning room. And there servers are the most on organised I have ever seen

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Very modern with a lot of facilities for the occupants and visitors. Cleanliness in all areas. ?

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    They do not provide for memory care. When dealing with elderly, they need this as part of the overall package. A very short and disappointing experience.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My dad's care was the worst ever at Regency, first of all he wasn't assessed when he arrived and therefore the doctor claimed that the bedsores did not happen there!!! This is a bull faced lie and he ended up getting the worst bedsores we have EVER seen. He was left sitting in his poop on more than one occasion and one of the times it was for a couple hours! His health has declined greatly from this to where his whole butt was raw and can sit or even lay in comfort. I honestly wouldn't refer this place to anyone who cares about their families!!!!!!!!! You are supposed to have full faith in these facilities that they are to provide excellent care for your loved ones and we have totally faith in the Regency

About Regency At Grand Blanc

General Information

Legal Business NameGrand Blanc Care Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 26, 2013 (4 years)
Capacity138
Residents130
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regency At Grand Blanc

Regency At Grand Blanc
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Michigan Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 27, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

December 10, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

October 16, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regency At Grand Blanc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 45min
1hr 35min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.0%
72.7%
72.7%
72.7%
92.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.9%
100.0%
100.0%
75.0%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.1%
54.5%
-
57.1%
49.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.2%
36.4%
25.6%
33.3%
22.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.7%
22.2%
11.4%
11.0%
17.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.3%
9.1%
8.3%
4.9%
13.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.9%
7.1%
7.9%
11.9%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
45.8%
37.0%
15.3%
26.8%
7.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.8%
18.2%
10.0%
9.1%
7.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.5%
6.2%
3.4%
10.0%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.8%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1%
6.5%
5.0%
2.3%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

95.1%
95.2%
78.5%
46.7%
80.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.9%
84.0%
84.0%
84.0%
79.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.9%
82.5%
84.4%
85.4%
70.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
36.5%
32.7%
30.0%
28.3%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.3%
0.5%
0.2%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.4%
2.4%
2.4%
2.6%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places