Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Michigan (MI)
  4. Houghton Lake
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community

General Information

Legal Business NameAtrium King Centre, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 4, 1992 (25 years)
Capacity61
Residents57
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community

King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Michigan Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 22, 2016 - 3 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a detailed, written plan for disasters and emergencies, such as fire, severe weather, and missing residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a post-discharge plan with the resident and family for the resident's care after leaving the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.

December 3, 2015 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

January 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 29, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,503 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.3%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
92.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.9%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
40.0%
30.0%
49.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.2%
22.4%
23.5%
27.3%
22.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.0%
6.0%
10.1%
18.6%
17.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.3%
1.9%
0.0%
2.1%
13.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.7%
22.7%
13.3%
11.9%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
1.8%
2.2%
0.0%
7.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.4%
11.3%
10.2%
2.1%
7.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1%
1.9%
4.1%
6.4%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1%
5.7%
8.2%
8.5%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
98.2%
93.7%
96.7%
80.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.4%
81.8%
81.8%
81.8%
79.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.5%
79.4%
89.3%
92.6%
70.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.9%
13.3%
8.2%
2.0%
17.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened