Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regency At Shelby Township

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Michigan
  3. Shelby Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sarah Tague
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    Social Work at this facility needs a lot of work! When you are advocating for, and in charge of patient care after they leave your facility, you should know how things work with insurance, appeals, etc. Patients should not be waiting over a week for DME that the social worker claims she ordered. If one of my employees made the mistakes this Social Worker made, they would no longer be working for me! The direct care staff is great!! No complaints there. The place is clean, front desk is very pleasant, food was great!! The management needs to make some real changes in the social work department for the sake of patients who are unable to advocate for themselves! All I can say, is thank God my father has me because Social Work at this facility has really dropped the ball on his case and cost him hundreds of unnecessary out of pocket expenses as well as pain and suffering of an unnecessary move. All because one social worker didn't do her job!!!!

  • bill little
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My father was well taken care of at Regency! His PT made him more capable of walking and being more independent.

  • Hannah Loudermilk
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Very poor management of time and manners towards clientele. They'll come shut off the call light 30-45 minutes before they even have the time to help that patient and then get upset when someone comes and asks for help when they've been waiting an hour or more. The nurses assistants openly talk about aggravating patients or guests in front of patients.

  • Kelli Strucienski
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I recently spent a month at Regency. It was a great place to be! I made an insane amount of progress while I was there. The staff....nurses, nurse aides, therapists, front desk workers, kitchen staff, cleaning staff....they were all very nice, very helpful, and made me feel very taken care of. I absolutely would recommend this place to anyone!

  • Sandra palazzola
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    As a patient at Regency at Shelby Township it has been the best experience I have ever had compared to any hospital or medical facility I have been in. The entire stay I have had good care. This is my third time at Regency and I am overwhelmed by the compassion and friendship of all of the nursing staff, therapists, and other team members. I would recommend this facility to anyone needing nursing care!

About Regency At Shelby Township

General Information

Legal Business NameShelby Township Care Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 12, 2015 (4 years)
Capacity116
Residents110
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regency At Shelby Township

Regency At Shelby Township was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Michigan Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 15, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.

August 16, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
JFewImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regency At Shelby Township require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
94.4%
94.4%
94.4%
92.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.9%
92.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
59.1%
65.2%
47.8%
50.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.4%
41.3%
40.4%
34.4%
22.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.5%
18.6%
10.6%
22.1%
17.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.5%
11.1%
17.8%
16.1%
12.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.9%
22.7%
4.7%
28.1%
13.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.4%
10.6%
0.0%
1.6%
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.0%
9.9%
11.4%
13.6%
6.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.2%
5.6%
0.0%
9.1%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.1%
10.6%
4.2%
1.6%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.0%
4.2%
4.2%
4.6%
3.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.2%
96.4%
92.5%
80.1%
80.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.6%
89.6%
88.5%
88.5%
79.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.6%
83.7%
79.1%
68.2%
71.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.5%
23.3%
24.5%
25.2%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.6%
2.1%
1.2%
2.1%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places