Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Anoka Rehabilitation And Living Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. Anoka Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Hattie Poole
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Great place to live or receive transitional care. Therapy is amazing. Nursing staff are caring, kind and attentive to meet your individual needs. Beautiful place. Large rooms..Large bathrooms. Also a great place to work.

  • Madelyn Blaha
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Great organization. Very pleased with my time here. Jared was especially helpful.

  • Tim Anderson
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Homestead has severe problems with the care in their rehab facility. It seems that the staffs cellphones get more attention than the people they are supposed be caring for. My mother was there before she passed away and would call my sister crying because no one would answer her calls. She was left on a toilet for 45 minutes before anyone would bother returning. They would also punish those who preferred to eat their dinner in their room by holding off diner until everyone else ate and then finally feeding them after 7PM. Countless times my mother who was unable to walk would be forced to sit until the slow moving staff would either get up the energy to walk down the hallway to their room or until they got bored sitting on their phones.i have a friend who's mother was in the same facility and experienced the same problems. My friends mother fell and was told by the staff not to mention the fall. She also had a reaction to meds that affected her breathing which required an ambulance to be called. When they arrived, before they could take her to the hospital they needed to speak to the nurse about the meds she was given. It took EMTs 20 minutes to find the nurse. Same situation with my mother. She was once again forced to wait for a nurse to administer pain meds because the nurse went on a food run to Subway. I'm angry at this place how my mother was treated and feel guilt allowing her to stay. The facility got paid because with the amount of staff it's obvious that they do their best not to cut too deep into the profits. I honestly would not have my dog stay at this facility after what my mother went through.

  • Burton Dahle
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This place was great. My mother stayed here after having a stroke and they took very good care of her and she liked. I would recommend it.

  • Andre King
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My aunt moved into the assisted living after staying in their TCU. She was resistant to moving into an assisted living at first (after living in her house for 60 years) but she is so happy she did! At home she had become isolated and never wanted to leave the house. Now every time I call or visit her she is busy doing activities or on outings! She has meet some great friends at the community who she looks forward to seeing at lunch, bingo and she is even part of the bell choir. This has truly been a second chapter in her life and we have the staff at the Homestead to thank for that.

About Anoka Rehabilitation And Living Center

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Homestead At Anoka Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 7, 1976 (44 years)
Capacity120
Residents109
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Anoka Rehabilitation And Living Center

Anoka Rehabilitation And Living Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Anoka Rehabilitation And Living Center has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Anoka Rehabilitation And Living Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.0%
97.2%
97.2%
97.2%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7%
91.5%
90.5%
100.0%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.5%
75.0%
74.2%
63.3%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.2%
12.7%
13.2%
9.1%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.9%
28.8%
11.8%
13.8%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.9%
7.0%
3.2%
4.7%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
27.3%
11.3%
13.2%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.0%
20.3%
11.3%
12.5%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
6.8%
1.2%
3.8%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
7.8%
8.9%
8.3%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.3%
1.4%
1.6%
4.8%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7%
1.4%
1.6%
1.6%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
5.6%
6.3%
9.4%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
3.4%
1.0%
1.0%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

70.7%
84.8%
86.3%
92.2%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.3%
78.2%
78.2%
78.2%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.4%
55.9%
64.8%
67.5%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.1%
9.5%
10.0%
9.6%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
0.6%
0.6%
1.6%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.3%
0.1%
0.7%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places