Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Valley Care And Rehab LLC

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. Barnesville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    I highly recommend Valley Care and Rehab to people who are looking to live or work in long-term care. It definitely does not have a "facility" vibe, instead it is like a second family. There is always someone to greet you with a smile on their face when you walk through the doors. Whether it is the administrator, director of nursing, office staff, nursing staff or a resident, someone will be ready and willing to start up a conversation. I had the opportunity to work there under the current management and was provided a great learning experience which has helped me tremendously in my career. There were multiple opportunities for promotion and growth which is not easy to find other places. The administrator and director of nursing are down to earth individuals that set high expectations for themselves and for their staff to provide the highest quality of care to the residents. They are open, honest, and hospitable people who want to keep staff, residents, and resident families as satisfied as possible. They are more than willing to teach if you are willing to learn. Being able to be a part of the Valley Care and Rehab family has positively impacted my life in so many ways. Every day was fulfilling and I always looked forward to going to work. Again, I highly recommend this home away from home if you are looking for a relaxed, small town environment.

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I can't say anything from a residents perspective but I can attest to staffing. They have a very high turnover rate, with department heads that are impossible to please. It is not a good work environment you will often experience the "cold shoulder" from the owners along with dirty looks and an overall negative feeling. You may be great at your job but if they don't like you on a personal level they will find another reason to fire you and hide behind that reason.

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Very unethical circumstances happen here, a good amount of employees do not go by the care plan. when somebody is striving to do the right thing, you become a target to management and other employees and they deliberately try to find something wrong with you. It's very clicky, management does not communicate with new employees, they go by what other people say regarding drama and rumors instead of getting to know the employee. It's a very negative atmosphere, employees are constantly complaining and speaking down about their co workers. The administrator is manipulative and tries to intimidate you when things don't go his way or he feels threatened by somebody trying to do the right thing. Toxic atmosphere.

  • ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Great place to work!

About Valley Care And Rehab LLC

General Information

Legal Business NameValley Care And Rehab LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1985 (32 years)
Capacity35
Residents34
Percent Occupied97%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Valley Care And Rehab LLC

Valley Care And Rehab LLC
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 31, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionSend unopened mail from residents and promptly deliver unopened mail to residents.

February 19, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Valley Care And Rehab LLC require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
3hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

92.3%
91.2%
91.2%
91.2%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.9%
77.4%
80.0%
90.6%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
50.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.0%
3.3%
6.7%
9.4%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.9%
20.2%
20.9%
21.9%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
35.5%
30.0%
27.6%
29.0%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.2%
32.0%
38.5%
35.5%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.5%
-
-
22.3%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
15.6%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.4%
11.1%
7.4%
6.9%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2%
6.5%
6.7%
0.0%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9%
0.0%
4.3%
3.6%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.3%
-
-
-
81.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
73.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places