Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Meadow Lane Rehabilitation & Healthcare Ctr

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. Benson Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • B Tooo
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Meadow lane is such a welcoming place with smiling faces, awesome staff, delicious food, and fun activities!

  • Josh Iskierka
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    We visited someone who will be staying here for a short time, and it felt like a very sad place to be. We were there a total of 30 minutes and while there we listened to an elderly woman call for help for half the time because she was falling out of bed and then one of the nurses came in with a brownie for our diabetic friend. Nurses seemed to care more about social hour and conversing at the front desk than actually working. I wouldn't let my dog live out his last days here let alone a family member of mine.

  • jennifer smith
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Amazing place to work and live. Great staff. friendly environment!! Excellent food!!! Great activities!

  • Bob Slaughter
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My grandmother is there and could not be more pleased with her care. Very friendly staff, activities (especially the bands) that Grandma enjoys and she loves the food. Would not want her anywhere else nor does she want to be anywhere else.

  • Scott & Rose Williams
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Awful place. They dont care about the patients at all. If you love your parents then dont put them in this place ever

About Meadow Lane Rehabilitation & Healthcare Ctr

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareMay 1, 1986 (34 years)
Capacity62
Residents45
Percent Occupied73%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Meadow Lane Rehabilitation & Healthcare Ctr

Meadow Lane Rehabilitation & Healthcare Ctr was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 2, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Meadow Lane Rehabilitation & Healthcare Ctr require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 15min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.3%
97.6%
97.6%
97.6%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.1%
8.1%
6.2%
5.6%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.6%
5.2%
15.4%
11.9%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.9%
10.8%
9.4%
5.9%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.1%
16.2%
25.8%
13.9%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.7%
12.5%
5.9%
5.4%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.4%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1%
2.5%
2.9%
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.7%
5.0%
8.6%
10.8%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.0%
6.1%
6.5%
2.8%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.2%
86.2%
90.9%
-
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.5%
72.4%
72.4%
72.4%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.1%
-
-
-
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places