Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Martin Luther Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. Bloomington Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kate Blessing
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Martin Luther Campus is an experienced, lovely, caring community. I have had the privilege to work here for more than a year and am constantly impressed by the knowledge and commitment of my colleagues and the quality care provided to residents and patients at all care levels. For nearly 60 years, Martin Luther Campus has served seniors and others in our community - a legacy we are so very proud to share! In my daily work, I often interact with local area community members. Nothing is more touching than to learn that Martin Luther Campus has had a significant and positive hand in the care journey of their loved ones. What an honor to support a family in this critical and highly personal way.

  • Kelsey Buss
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I worked at Martin Luther Campus, and got to experience the care center, senior living and adult day program they have on campus. It's definitely been my favorite place I've worked. I enjoyed being part of a wonderful community where I made great relationships with both team members and residents. The team truly cares about the roles they play in the residents lives, and making each day meaningful! I wouldn't hesitate in using any of their services for my loved ones!

  • Luke LaBounty
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    The Martin Luther Campus is truly a one of a kind community. All of the staff were wonderful to work with, and they care so deeply for the residents. I would recommend this campus to anyone looking for a new home or place to recover, and also as a workplace for those seeking a supportive and enjoyable workplace!

  • Shania Skrzypcak
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    The staff members treat their residents with respect and dignity and they do all that they can to provide safe, quality care. Martin Luther Campus creates an exceptional customer experience.

  • sammantha silk
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Martin Luther is an stand up place. The amount of love and support the residents and family receive from everyone is incredible.

About Martin Luther Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameMartin Lm LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1985 (35 years)
Capacity137
Residents128
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Martin Luther Care Center

Martin Luther Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 21, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

March 2, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Martin Luther Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
99.0%
98.0%
100.0%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.8%
66.7%
71.4%
68.5%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.3%
8.1%
7.1%
8.2%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.5%
15.3%
16.4%
14.1%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.7%
15.3%
18.8%
18.2%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.2%
15.7%
14.8%
16.7%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.0%
2.0%
6.2%
0.0%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8%
8.1%
8.8%
15.6%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
7.0%
4.9%
6.3%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.1%
2.1%
2.2%
1.1%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1%
5.0%
3.1%
2.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.0%
5.0%
5.1%
4.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
3.9%
2.1%
0.7%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.7%
98.0%
98.8%
98.8%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.9%
95.1%
95.1%
95.1%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.9%
76.4%
78.2%
74.6%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
29.4%
25.5%
31.8%
35.3%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7%
2.2%
2.4%
2.8%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.0%
1.2%
1.8%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places