Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Gardens At Cannon Falls

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. Cannon Falls
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    The staff is so kind and friendly. Thank you for your smiles! They have been very accommodating.

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    If their admission staff is as bad as their nursinng staff I can see why they have such a low rating.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Awful care, bad food and dirty. I've had three family members here over the years and it's only gotten worse. I wouldn't want my worst enemy cared for at this facility.

About The Gardens At Cannon Falls

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1986 (32 years)
Capacity74
Residents56
Percent Occupied76%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Gardens At Cannon Falls

The Gardens At Cannon Falls
was reviewed by to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 1, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program for mentally-ill and mentally-retarded patients.

December 7, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

October 29, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

December 12, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHire a qualified dietician.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

November 12, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$27,494 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Gardens At Cannon Falls require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.3%
96.6%
96.6%
96.6%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.2%
83.0%
77.4%
75.9%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.7%
55.0%
87.5%
-
50.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.0%
15.9%
14.6%
14.0%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
36.4%
31.2%
26.6%
18.3%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
38.8%
45.7%
38.0%
36.0%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.7%
23.3%
24.4%
22.9%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.8%
25.9%
17.9%
14.6%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.7%
19.6%
28.8%
25.0%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3%
13.2%
12.2%
11.6%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.7%
17.8%
9.6%
12.0%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
6.5%
1.9%
3.8%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.3%
6.4%
1.9%
3.7%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.8%
4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

61.8%
48.3%
31.2%
38.6%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.9%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
81.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6%
70.1%
-
-
73.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
36.0%
45.2%
31.2%
28.6%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
0.0%
4.8%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.4%
1.9%
2.3%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places