Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Golden Livingcenter - Hopkins

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. Hopkins
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sara Chmielewski
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I have never been a part of a more compassionate, supportive, hardworking, and committed team. Each staff member genuinely cares for the residents and strives to make decisions with the residents in mind. This facility is over looked from suggestive reviews and appearance, but once you step inside you will see teamwork at its best.

  • Kathryn Roman
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I would not send my dog to this place. It is my belief that my brother passed away from neglect but I have no way to prove it. He was wheelchair bound and they had to take him out of his room to a hallway bathroom because they don't have accessible bathrooms in the rooms and that is where he died. I had talked to him earlier during the day and he had complained about how long they left him sitting on the toilet and I believe that is what happened. They found him on the floor in there with no explanation as to what happened so that tells me no one was in there with him when he died. It is a terrible place, communication is very difficult due to the high number of immigrants working there who knew or spoke very little english. They had problems understanding my brothers needs when he asked for things, (I was there when he was trying to explain that he needed help finding the remote for the TV because he couldn't see it.) It just is not safe there.

  • Q R Roberts
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    This place needs to be closed. It's a filthy mess. It smells. It's infested with ants. The care is questionable. It's understaffed. The nutrition is horrible. The business office uses strong arm techniques, is rude and disrespectful. If your relative needs nursing care, then look elsewhere. If your relative lives here, then look into an alternative placement.

  • Brittney Shilson
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    There is so much that I would like to say about this place, however I will just keep it short and sweet. Please do not send your family here under any circumstance if you can help it. It is utter trash.

  • Galina Gumeniuc
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

About Golden Livingcenter - Hopkins

General Information

Legal Business NameBeverly Enterprises - Minnesota LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1985 (32 years)
Capacity138
Residents106
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Golden Livingcenter - Hopkins

Golden Livingcenter - Hopkins was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 3, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide residents with private access to a telephone.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

January 27, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

October 22, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Golden Livingcenter - Hopkins require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 60min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.1%
93.8%
93.8%
93.8%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.9%
96.3%
98.8%
95.3%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.8%
41.4%
33.3%
35.1%
50.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.2%
13.4%
17.1%
19.5%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
31.5%
24.1%
34.2%
18.8%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.0%
26.4%
21.1%
26.7%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.6%
19.0%
16.2%
28.4%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.9%
2.2%
14.0%
15.8%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.4%
8.6%
7.2%
9.5%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8%
6.2%
8.7%
6.8%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.6%
5.2%
5.2%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
1.2%
6.0%
4.7%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
0.0%
1.2%
1.2%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
3.3%
1.0%
1.8%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

77.4%
76.4%
86.8%
84.7%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.5%
79.0%
79.0%
79.0%
81.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.4%
54.8%
52.7%
53.2%
73.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
19.6%
24.3%
16.2%
20.0%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
0.0%
3.4%
5.0%
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.5%
1.1%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places