Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Hopkins Health Services

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. Hopkins Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • eshgettitty mcgrady
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    I would not recommend this place to anyone who love their relative. The place is understaffed and staff are rude or too busy to answer any questions. The business office manager is always too busy to answer any questions and seems to always direct residents out of her office. There is another lady who sits in there and she acts as though she doesn't hear very well. My mother had the worst time dealing with anyone in that office. Avoid this place at all cost. Too pricey for the lack of care you receive.

  • Shelly Bourland
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My grandmother was here. Horrible place. Horrible staff. Don't answer lights when patients turn them on. She had to wait a very long time to just go to the bathroom. The only reason she had to be there was it was cheap. She didn't even ever want to be left alone. It was so cold in her room! They said no we can't turn the air conditioning down. I mean it was cold! Did a terrible job paying attention to her healthcare. Makes me and my family just sick she ever had to be there.

  • Kari J
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Avoid this place at all costs! Count my one star rating as a negative 10 stars. My mother's friend had years ago recommended the place. It has clearly changed for the worse since 2012. The nurses aide seemed not to know what a fall monitor was, was unable to push the wheelchair with my mom in it onto the scale, and altogether seemed as helpless as Gilligan. The admitting nurse actually shone a flashlight into my mom's mouth, after being told she had only her real teeth. The private room was enormous and reeked of old: old linoleum-tile floor, old fixtures, old furniture. Old and very depressing. There was no way I would leave my dog there let alone a person. The tracks from the old curtains were still in the ceiling and showed there had been at least two beds in the room at one time. Now the two chairs, dresser, nightstand and bed looked like they were leftovers from the 50s. The depressing bed sported a 3" thick mattress. The dining room was windowless and smaller than the private room. I got qualms as soon as I realized I'd driven past the driveway, as overgrown trees and bushes hid the sign. Once in the parking lot you can see the unkempt building. There are two non-descript doorways off the parking lot; since the interior looked dark on the north entrance, I went to the south entrance. There I found a vacant reception desk--not a soul in sight. Since the ambulance transporting my mom from Methodist Hospital was still sitting outside, I started walking the halls. Luckily I encountered the two ambulance attendants who seemed in a rush to get the hell out of the building--they told me her room number. I didn't meet a single staff person in the halls on the way to her room. We left within the hour. The Methodist Hospital social worker we had was in a hurry to leave early that day, and pressured us into making a TCU choice before I had a chance to research. Again, avoid this joint at all costs. Methodist Hospital, HealthPartners and Park Nicollet should be ashamed to list this rank operation as anything but ready for demolition.

  • Echo Aspnes
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Echo Aspens via Ron Aspens- I enjoyed my stay at Hopkins Health Services and the food was good. I personally don't like staying at nursing facilities but my stay was ok.

  • Paul Peshek
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Had a wonderful visit today for almost 7 hours. Staff happy, smiling, inviting. Spoke with several residents very pleased with therapy and nursing. Clean, no odors. Sheppards pie for lunch...thank you for hospitiality!

About Hopkins Health Services

General Information

Legal Business NameBeverly Enterprises - Minnesota LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1985 (34 years)
Capacity138
Residents106
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Hopkins Health Services

Hopkins Health Services was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Hopkins Health Services has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Hopkins Health Services require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 60min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.8%
95.7%
95.7%
95.7%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8%
100.0%
100.0%
98.5%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.0%
37.0%
48.0%
46.2%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.7%
11.9%
11.8%
18.3%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.2%
20.5%
17.4%
27.5%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.4%
16.7%
25.0%
27.4%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.3%
18.2%
16.4%
44.1%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.1%
9.0%
5.5%
10.6%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.1%
14.3%
12.8%
5.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
2.6%
10.6%
8.6%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.2%
6.9%
0.0%
1.7%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
1.3%
1.4%
3.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.0%
3.8%
1.4%
2.9%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.9%
0.8%
1.0%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

84.7%
92.0%
94.0%
92.6%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.0%
86.3%
86.3%
86.3%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.1%
58.9%
47.1%
49.6%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.0%
18.2%
12.0%
25.4%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
1.1%
3.9%
3.2%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
1.3%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places