Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Good Samaritan Society - Jackson

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. Jackson
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

About Good Samaritan Society - Jackson

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 1987 (30 years)
Capacity57
Residents46
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Good Samaritan Society - Jackson

Good Samaritan Society - Jackson
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 15, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

May 26, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

August 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

July 24, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residentís assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Good Samaritan Society - Jackson require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.1%
98.0%
98.0%
98.0%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.8%
100.0%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
66.7%
73.9%
47.6%
50.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.6%
9.1%
17.1%
14.6%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
34.3%
25.3%
18.3%
7.8%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.7%
17.4%
15.9%
15.0%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.0%
7.0%
7.3%
5.0%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.5%
1.9%
0.0%
2.0%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.9%
6.4%
6.7%
7.3%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
7.3%
7.5%
2.9%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
11.6%
6.7%
2.4%
2.4%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.3%
12.8%
4.4%
2.4%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.0%
10.6%
8.9%
4.8%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2%
6.3%
3.7%
3.9%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.7%
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.0%
85.2%
87.5%
92.0%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.9%
66.7%
66.7%
66.7%
81.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
73.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
20.0%
-
-
0.0%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened