Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Laurels Peak Care & Rehabilitation Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. Mankato Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Brandon Xiong
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Good workers who really pull their weight and go beyond their job titles are taken for granted. Hours are never steady and it's not as flexible as it should be. This really does make the facility lose potentially great employees, while current employees are constantly leaving. The people/staff can be tough to work with, and that really can effect the work environment. There seems to always be drama and those that gossip or talk behind others backs. Also, people can really make you feel bad for not picking up hours or swapping days. There is always a lack of employees or staff, and yet there doesn't seem to be a great push to work together or work harder at recruiting and maintaining new or current employees. The job itself is rewarding and enjoyable, but it is disheartening to feel taken for granted and taken advantage of. if the facility was better at staffing and scheduling, that would take a lot of pressure and stress out from their employees. From this, the work environment could definitely improve. Their would be more positives, leading to more potential people interested in the jobs. If the facility had the time and budget, having employees build bonds and work on team work could also really improve relations between employees, turning to more enjoyable work relationships. tl/dr Work is not actually bad but there is no comradery. needs better staffing and scheduling to ease tensions and stress.

  • A Johnson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Just a bad company to work for. Employee turn over is sky high, pay is terrible. Any employee that is worth anything promptly leaves after they realize what a mess that place is. So no surprises employees working there 90% are worthless and continue to work there even with sexual harassment allegations against them. MDH visits typically go bad as the quality of care is poor.

  • Heather Slama
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This facility is beautiful who provides excellent care to match!

  • Erin Aanenson
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    Amazing place to live and work! Kind, caring, and compassionate staff!

  • Heather Defries
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Laurels Peak Care & Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLaurels Peak Health Care LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1988 (32 years)
Capacity65
Residents56
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Laurels Peak Care & Rehabilitation Center

Laurels Peak Care & Rehabilitation Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 9, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a post-discharge plan with the resident and family for the resident's care after leaving the nursing home.

June 1, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

May 4, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Laurels Peak Care & Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 25min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.3%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
86.4%
78.6%
85.4%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.0%
13.2%
13.9%
17.9%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.4%
40.0%
31.7%
19.6%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.7%
10.3%
8.1%
5.3%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.8%
13.2%
22.2%
5.1%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
2.3%
4.9%
5.0%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.4%
35.8%
27.5%
12.0%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
11.8%
2.9%
3.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.7%
11.4%
5.4%
2.9%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3%
4.5%
4.8%
2.4%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
4.7%
5.8%
0.0%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.0%
92.8%
97.4%
94.0%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.2%
94.0%
94.0%
94.0%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.8%
86.4%
82.5%
79.9%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
35.8%
35.4%
29.0%
21.5%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1%
3.3%
1.6%
1.5%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.0%
3.2%
2.0%
0.9%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places