Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. New Brighton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I gave 3 stars because of his first visit otherwise it would have been 2. My father is here it is his second time. The first was for stroke rehab and this time it is for a broken hip rehab. He had a decent experience the first time but this time has been terrible. There is one PT staff member we remember from last time otherwise turnover seems to be abundant. If you have a loved one in here be sure you have someone around to advocate for them, and who pays attention to the procedures the staff are conducting. I will not go through all the documentation I have written so far of this short visit. I am sure there are worst places, but don't go there thinking that everything they say at the top trickles down and is followed through with. Be vigilant about follow-up and documentation. Be aware of what is going on around you when you visit and continue to ask questions of the staff and your loved one. Its exhausting to do on top of worrying about a loved one, but it seems to be the only way to move things forward at this place. Best of luck on recovery for you or your loved one. PS shower policy we were told was only once a week, how would you feel :(

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Caring staff and home like environment. Wonderful place!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Very good care center, I am doing clinical here, and it has been very good experience I witness between the residents/ patients and workers.

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Our family has nothing but positive things to say about the staff in the short term care unit at Benedictine. Our father ended up being there for a lengthy period of time, and they took such good care of him. They were also too kind to our family who was going through a very difficult time. We cannot thank them enough, or say enough good things about the staff.

  • ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    Well done

About Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 26, 1986 (32 years)
Capacity105
Residents98
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck

Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 6, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

April 29, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

March 26, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.9%
93.3%
93.3%
93.3%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.6%
94.3%
94.4%
94.1%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.2%
90.3%
88.5%
80.0%
50.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.0%
1.6%
1.6%
0.0%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.5%
6.9%
5.9%
9.4%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.5%
14.5%
14.3%
11.8%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.6%
9.5%
1.6%
6.6%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.6%
4.4%
8.4%
5.2%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7%
8.6%
7.0%
4.4%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
5.7%
2.9%
3.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.9%
5.7%
5.6%
4.5%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
1.4%
1.4%
1.5%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3%
1.4%
2.8%
2.9%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
0.0%
1.1%
1.2%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.2%
81.6%
79.7%
79.6%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.1%
92.6%
92.6%
92.6%
81.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.5%
57.6%
59.2%
63.3%
73.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.4%
10.3%
12.4%
12.4%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.1%
1.7%
1.8%
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
1.3%
0.7%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places