Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

New Brighton Opco LLC

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. New Brighton Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Morgan
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Do NOT allow your loved ones to stay here and receive care at this facility. My uncle stayed here for several weeks after getting out of the hospital (due to issues caused by neglectful, inhumane treatment at the Richfield Villa facility) and when he was discharged from New Brighton, they did not give him any discharge paperwork or meds. When he went back to his apartment at an assisted living facility, he was told he could not stay there because NB Villa had not given him discharge paperwork and his meds. The staff at his assisted living building said this was unheard of and this facility should be reported. AVOID THIS PLACE.

  • Joan Johnson
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    A close family member spent six days their recently and barely escaped with her life. Severely understaffed. Outdated equipment. Filthy environment. Dingy lighting. Run down....etc. On more than one occasion (daily) throughout her 6 day stay, she was made to lay in her own urine and feces for more than 12 hours, one time it was 17 hours. When someone did finally come in to change/clean her, they wiped her off and then simply stuck a diaper between her legs and walked away. She asked if they were going to change the soaked dirty sheets. There answer to her is, no, you'll dry. The police were called to come 3 different times and came out each time to write up reports on the facility for adult abuse. In 2018 this place had almost 900 complaints filed against it with the State. A big thank you to the State of MN, you allow people to make a complaint, but, apparently do nothing to fix this on going problem, that is very sad. When she went in their, she had no rashes, blisters, or bruises, but left with all of that after six days. This tends to happen when you are left to lay in urine and feces and not be turned on a regular bases. Her blood sugars were out of control and her blood pressure was off the charts, in stroking rage. This was most likely based on the fact that they were not giving her the correct amount of insulin, or on a regular basis. Every time she received her medication, it was a different amount of pills, figure that one out, we can't. They did admit to giving her to much blood thinner. She got there on a Thursday and didn't see a doctor until the following Tuesday and then only for 5 minutes. I invite all of the corporate big wigs that own this facility, to go and spend a few days their. You are all no better than Hitler in allowing the people that come trustingly to you for care, to live like this, in those conditions. If you're not able to take on that level of patient care, such as my family member required, than you shouldn't be taking people like her in. The work 'greed' comes to my mind. She left to go to a new facility, Homestead in Anoka, and first had to go back to the hospital because of all of the health things listed above. A person should not have to leave a supposed rehabilitative facility to go back into the hospital because her care their made her worse. For those who work their, a civil complaint should be filed on the owners of that company for making you work in deplorable rundown outdated conditions without out the correct amount of staffing.

  • darin olson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My family has had nothing but a positive experience with a Villa, New Brighton. The staff from administrative and admissions, social services, medical staff ,food service, and even housekeeping all have treated our father with respect while protecting his dignity. There are countless situations and acts by the people that work here that touch our hearts in ways that we can easily sleep at night knowing we have left our father in the care of people we can trust. This is the best gift we can receive. We are grateful to everyone who has committed to his care.

  • Kyle Hershey
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    The nursing staff is amazing

  • Karl Anderson
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    A close friend was there and barely escaped with their life .

About New Brighton Opco LLC

General Information

Legal Business NameFmg First Avenue Northwest Minnesota LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 9, 1968 ()
Capacity100
Residents95
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for New Brighton Opco LLC

New Brighton Opco LLC was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 9, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

February 22, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,665 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of New Brighton Opco LLC require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.0%
95.2%
95.2%
95.2%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
96.1%
77.5%
80.0%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.2%
64.6%
60.9%
52.5%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.7%
14.5%
5.8%
10.4%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.7%
30.3%
22.6%
20.4%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.2%
11.1%
9.2%
10.9%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.1%
25.0%
15.9%
14.9%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.0%
1.3%
2.8%
7.4%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
2.8%
4.8%
0.9%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.3%
8.8%
8.8%
17.5%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
11.3%
14.5%
16.4%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
1.3%
2.8%
2.9%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3%
6.5%
7.0%
4.3%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
0.8%
1.8%
0.8%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.8%
85.6%
80.4%
65.9%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.2%
83.7%
83.7%
83.7%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.5%
61.1%
62.6%
65.1%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.9%
8.1%
5.4%
3.8%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
2.5%
1.2%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places