Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Therese Home

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. New Hope Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • bert rowan
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Recently, we had the need to move loved one into an Independent Living Care Facility, with the option to increase services as we require them. Being from out of town, we only had five days to meet with Marketing and Sales Directors of three different facilities, view the facilities, make a decision, go through the application process, and then make the move. We found The St. Therese Facility, met all of our needs, we noticed the staff to be caring and kind to the residents. The facility, when compared to the other three in the area, was outstanding. The deciding factor for our family was that the Sales and Marketing Director, was completely available willing and so very helpful to meet our needs, meet our time schedule, and will to do what ever was necessary to help us accomplish our urgent mission. With her expertise, flexibility, communication, and always willing to go above and beyond to solve every issue, it happened. But most of all it was the sensitivity, caring, compassion and kindness, that set this facility far beyond what any other care facility could offer. She was the catalyst of the solution. Again, thank you! We are pleased and comforted that our loved one is in a healthy environment, as a resident of Saint Therese on Bass Lake Road in New Hope, MN

  • Tana Biegler
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I love working here it's like home away from home caring for the residents seeing them smile telling me they missed me while I was off and them saying "oh am I glad to see u back" just melts my ? my coworkers are amazing. I can see myself learning and experiencing new things and challenges but it's all worth it. Great family friendly orientated facility.

  • Davontay Johnson
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My post was removed so I'm posting under my husband's account. This place failed my mother! She complained about wait times with the call light, no oxygen was given to her when she asked for it because of shortness of breath. I will seek legal action if this review is deleted!

  • Dennis Manson
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My mother just completed her rehab after surgery at Saint Therese New Hope. She had great Therapy -she met her goals early and was able to go home a week earlier than was expected. She had several caring nurses and nursing assistants as well as pastoral care that helped her! Thank you for your care! -Dennis Manson

  • John Francis
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I was there for 5 weeks for my knee rehab great nursing staff a definitely help heal me these guys are incredible No place is perfect but over all they have a great staff and I'd love to go back there again Thank you Toni for your great staff and support.

About St Therese Home

General Information

Legal Business NameSt Therese Home Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1988 (32 years)
Capacity258
Residents234
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Therese Home

St Therese Home was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 5, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

July 1, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$58,950 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Therese Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.6%
95.3%
95.3%
95.3%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.3%
82.2%
82.2%
85.3%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.9%
61.6%
63.0%
62.3%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.3%
11.3%
10.5%
8.5%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.0%
19.3%
22.1%
13.9%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.9%
15.5%
16.6%
16.9%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5%
18.2%
21.7%
13.3%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.5%
12.8%
10.3%
9.1%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
0.7%
2.2%
2.8%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.7%
4.5%
5.9%
4.2%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
2.9%
4.3%
3.7%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
2.8%
1.1%
1.7%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
2.8%
3.4%
3.4%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
1.8%
1.4%
2.6%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.5%
86.1%
74.4%
77.5%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.7%
79.9%
79.9%
79.9%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.8%
75.7%
74.9%
76.4%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
27.4%
28.8%
28.4%
23.2%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.5%
2.4%
1.5%
2.5%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places