Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. Saint Paul
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • goodnewsminnesota
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Great atmosphere! Friendly staff ("caregivers")! If you have an elderly person in your family in need of a place, this is the one! Kids (grand kids) love coming here as there is a shy "talking" parrot by the elevator. Just don't stick your finger as he'll bite! :) Just talk with it (him/her)! They have lots of events (indoor and outdoor) for the residents to go too!

  • Jeffrey Marks
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Shalom Home does not return phone calls when they have a problem, and the therapists don't show up for appointments. Very disappointing for a home that gets so much praise and support from the community. Care is inconsistent. It is adequate at times and also inadequate at other times. The beds are disgusting (the mattress slides around and they don't have much protection from falling out of bed. Furniture definitely needs to be updated. It must be from the 1950's. Foods is very salty. 9/8/16

  • goodnewseverybodycom
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Awesome place for residents of various faiths or none too. Shalom (peace) ! God bless the staff here that they'll have strength and endurance to keep doing their great job helping others. :)

  • Olive Battaglia
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    WORST PLACE EVER!!! My grandmother went here for a few days after her surgery and the staff was so horrible to her. The staff made my grandmother strip down naked in front of them and shower while they watched even though she expressed that she felt uncomfortable and was crying, my grandmother also uses icy hot patches on her lower back and shoulders because she often has pain in those areas the staff took them away from her and threw them away, the staff was also extremely rude to my grandmother and the rest of my family everyday when we went to go visit her. DO NOT BRING YOUR LOVED ONES HERE!!!!!!

  • Chris Drive
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Patient not given pain medication after surgery -- infrequent. Family and friends aghast to see patient in agony and resorted to screaming at staff to give patient prescribed medication and they still did not give patient pain medications on a consistent basis. Never should have brought patient here. WARNING: DO NOT bring your loved one to this place! You do not rate any stars and should be ashamed of yourselves.

About Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East

General Information

Legal Business NameSholom Home East Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1987 (31 years)
Capacity108
Residents102
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East

Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 1, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.

September 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 5min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 40min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.1%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.4%
100.0%
97.1%
97.1%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.7%
69.0%
65.6%
61.3%
50.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.2%
17.3%
20.3%
13.6%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.2%
23.0%
8.7%
20.8%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.3%
15.8%
11.8%
10.1%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.4%
8.0%
5.2%
15.8%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.8%
10.4%
13.8%
3.5%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1%
3.5%
8.7%
4.3%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4%
2.0%
7.0%
7.1%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
14.5%
12.1%
15.4%
7.7%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3%
3.5%
5.8%
7.1%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
1.7%
1.4%
1.4%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
3.1%
4.2%
4.3%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

65.8%
74.0%
85.0%
92.1%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.3%
69.5%
69.5%
69.5%
81.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.5%
64.4%
63.2%
67.5%
73.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
30.6%
31.3%
29.6%
25.0%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.5%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
0.6%
1.0%
1.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places