Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Estates At St Louis Park LLC

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. St Louis Park Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ric morgan
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Hello friends and neighbors--- To begin with this "facility" was taken over on October 1, 2017 by Monarch "Healthcare" and renamed "The Estates of St Louis Park", Golden Living no longer has any affiliation with this place, let's put blame exactly where it belongs, squarely on Monarch Healthcare! Today, Feb.4, 2019 I didn't receive my 8 am or noon medications, furthermore, I bumped my leg on Jan. 8, 2019 and the next day I had a baseball sized lump on my leg.that I brought to the nursing staffs attention. Their response was "Keep an eye on it".My leg turned red and was warm to the touch. After 12 days of the nursing staff's failure to do anything other than to look at it and say"It's still swollen" I went to the doctor, she took one look at my leg and said "You've got cellulitis". My doctor has been seeing me every other day, she feels that my leg is that serious. That's the quality of the healthcare here! Much, much, more to follow in the coming days. Feb. 4, 2019

  • Kathi Gruenhagen
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I just visited my aunt. The first floor was empty. The elevator extremely slow as always. She had been moved AGAIN (always being moved), and staff couldn't speak English but only point me to where she was. Her front wheel on her wheel chair was missing all its rubber. Both the aide and nurse just shrugged their shoulders when I told them. Urine odor is always aweful. She was to receive therapy due to a fall and then moved closer to family YEARS AGO. And I could go on and on. The don't deserve even the 1 star.

  • Tonjia Reed
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This facility is undergoing a major transformation with new leadership and amazing teamwork. Compassionate care is being rejuvenated and only the highest quality care givers are being selected. The team is working hard to make major changes in all aspects of the facility for its residents and staff. I am excited to be part of this awesome re-birth!

  • thomas Wacha
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Overall staffing is good. However there are times when there is a long wait to answer the call lites due to short staffing. Meal quality at times is poor, bad tasting and small portions such as you would serve a preschool child. I have had my cell phone taken from my room (stolen) as I have heard several other residents say but hearsay.

  • Jeff Wuollet
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This facility is under all new management and leadership. The new leadership team is working hard to elevate the quality of care to all residents who live here. The leadership team is working towards having the most compassionate staff providing the best care, the highest quality meals and home like experience with engaging activities and amenities. It will take time, but this facility is taking HUGE steps of progress in improving the lives of those who there here.

About The Estates At St Louis Park LLC

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareMarch 1, 1968 ()
Capacity208
Residents177
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Estates At St Louis Park LLC

The Estates At St Louis Park LLC was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 13, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

January 30, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$63,861 fine
KSomeImmediate JeopardyHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
KSomeImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the facility is administered in an acceptable way that maintains the well-being of each resident .
FManyPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Review the work of each nurse aide every year; and 2) give regular in-service training based upon these reviews.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Estates At St Louis Park LLC require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
3hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

81.5%
98.9%
98.9%
98.9%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5%
96.9%
99.4%
100.0%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.6%
54.3%
56.1%
58.3%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.5%
21.7%
26.0%
25.0%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.3%
14.2%
19.0%
15.5%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.6%
24.1%
33.9%
34.1%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.4%
13.2%
16.9%
16.9%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.1%
9.4%
6.8%
8.0%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.2%
2.1%
11.0%
6.3%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.8%
6.7%
9.4%
6.8%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.8%
10.4%
7.0%
6.2%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
2.5%
2.6%
2.9%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
2.5%
1.5%
1.6%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.0%
85.2%
85.4%
77.8%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.5%
70.4%
70.4%
70.4%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.2%
91.9%
79.5%
-
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
12.4%
15.4%
16.7%
6.2%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7%
2.0%
6.5%
-
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places