Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Villa At St Louis Park

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. St Louis Park Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Paul Peterson
    ★★★★★ 4 weeks ago

    First off my to I'll m is fine no bad ? at all. All the staff I've had been really great. My first shower went great, the male aid was very helpful with my large size. I will not forget how nice he was. My room floor have been clean daily. So were this family saw problems I don't know.

  • kelly Finn
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Tell Shannon thank you for setting up all this care for me. Therapy and nursing came out yesterday. They did an excellent job. Miss Cheryl, Shugri, Ikran were wonderful. Michael the nurse was so intelligent. I had no visits from the hospital, but Mavis who is at the front came to visit me all the time. If she wasn't around, I would have sat in my room and crying. She was awesome. Please tell those staff what a great job they did.

  • Ron Anderson
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My mother had stayed there a couple of years ago when rehabbing from a shattered leg and...for the most part...had a good experience. She spent over a month there recently and their level of service has deteriorated dramatically. Although the caregivers and therapists are under staffed and over worked, they provided my mother with reasonably attentive, pleasant, quality care. Management and Administration were a very different story. Litterally the only time we received any communication from my mother's case worker, the business staff, etc. was when they needed something from us to get paid. Instead of the weekly care conferences for my mother they had conducted during her previous visit to keep us informed, they had only one during her entire stay this time...and that was clearly held so they could get signatures from us to get paid. We were given less than 72 hours of notice that our insurance was going to run out and we should find a permanent home for my mother. And my numerous calls and messages weren't returned for over a month when I tried to get answers to why the final they submitted invoice tried to charge us for over 400% of our actual charges. Yet after FINALLY getting an invoice for the corrected amount, I received a return call in less than an hour after leaving a voice message telling them I wanted to pay it over phone. The Villa also makes absolutely no effort to host any activities or social interactions for the patients. During each of the 15-20 times I visited my Mother, almost every patient was in their room by themselves....with most of them looking miserable and depressed. I wasn't aware of a single activity or social event conducted during the five weeks my mother was there. It was a very depressing atmosphere. I rate the Villa at St. Louis Park at two stars only because of the personal care attendants and the therapy staff. I would rated the Business and Admin staff at 0 stars. If my mother requires any more rehab stints, we definitely won't be returning to The Villa at St. Louis Park.

  • Stephanie Rockett
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My aunt had the opportubity to visit here during her stay. I feel she receiced exceptional care. I was able to communicate and get up to date status on her care. When things arise they were resolced and communicated in a timely manner.

  • Jennifer Miller
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I have been a resident at SLP since August. The staff here are 10x more attentive than any nursing home I have been in. Staff talk to me with respect and kindness. I am on the TCU and having a private room is everything to me. I was admitted to SLP for wound treatment and the rounding wound nurse, Toni's knowledge and skill set for healing my wound is similar to a nurse practitioner I see at my wound clinic. She is great! The physicians are great, but I have had issues with communication with the round pain doctor. He doesn't always communicate with me when he makes changes to by medication. When he does talk to me about it, we are on the same page. Dr. Reiman and my NP are wonderful!. The Therapy team is great and helpful. They communicate clearly about what my therapy plan is going to be and what goals we are trying to reach. Everyone here is friendly and nice. I would recommend this place to anyone needed rehab!

About The Villa At St Louis Park

General Information

Legal Business NameVilla At St Louis Park LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 31, 1973 (46 years)
Capacity105
Residents76
Percent Occupied72%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Villa At St Louis Park

The Villa At St Louis Park was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 8, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Villa At St Louis Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
92.4%
92.4%
92.4%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.2%
98.2%
100.0%
100.0%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
45.7%
37.0%
54.8%
48.1%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.0%
23.4%
14.9%
18.6%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.8%
24.7%
24.2%
25.6%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.3%
18.2%
10.9%
14.6%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
19.1%
12.8%
20.9%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.3%
9.3%
5.4%
4.1%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1%
7.3%
2.3%
2.6%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.6%
8.7%
5.1%
2.7%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4%
7.5%
0.0%
6.4%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5%
1.8%
1.8%
0.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
4.5%
3.3%
0.0%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

73.3%
77.3%
85.5%
93.6%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.5%
73.7%
73.7%
73.7%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.3%
70.6%
65.7%
62.9%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.1%
7.4%
12.5%
12.8%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
1.3%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.5%
0.4%
0.2%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places