Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

New Harmony Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Minnesota
  3. St Paul Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Jade Marie
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Feel free to reach out to me with questions. Please, for your loved one's sake don't bring them here.

  • Teresa Taylor
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I use to work here in 2001 and they never worked short. They used temporary agency to suffice any call outs. Very good nursing care at this facility. Past CNA

  • Polly Creager
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Total disrespect for family and Power of attorney. Administered meds that lead to seizures and theft of money and belongings. Lied about having his belongings and claiming to have an "open investigation" where the clients cash was "evidence". Still have not got his cash back and his power chair. Has since left this very unsettling facility.:( So disturbing that folks would treat an already suffering adult this way. They say they communicated with the patient but that is another lie. They make rules up as they go.

  • Nan Schutz
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My dad has been staying at New Harmony transitional care for a couple of weeks now and we have been seeing improvements physically and emotionally every day we go to visit. The facility is clean and patient has private room with bathroom attached. The care protocol is well implemented and thorough. I couldn't be more thankful for the staff and their work.

  • G Hofmann
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My family has been thrilled with the care and conditions at New Harmony. We are there nearly every day and I feel we see what really goes on. The staff is amazing--it is an upbeat atmosphere and I often see them stopping and chatting with residents so they don't feel ignored and even hugging them. And from the first time we walked in we noticed the absence of any unpleasant odor. Our family member is doing very well and we feel lucky to have been accepted at this facility.

About New Harmony Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 1, 1986 (33 years)
Capacity76
Residents68
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for New Harmony Care Center

New Harmony Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
New Harmony Care Center has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of New Harmony Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.2%
95.6%
95.6%
95.6%
96.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
24.0%
28.6%
27.3%
25.0%
51.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.2%
22.2%
25.0%
18.4%
12.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.3%
17.4%
15.1%
6.1%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.8%
24.6%
23.2%
26.8%
13.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3%
3.7%
9.6%
8.3%
14.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
7.1%
7.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
0.0%
6.6%
4.6%
9.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
4.5%
4.9%
0.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2%
4.9%
5.3%
3.6%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
4.9%
8.8%
10.7%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.1%
1.2%
1.7%
2.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

78.3%
80.0%
87.1%
75.7%
85.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.4%
88.0%
88.0%
88.0%
82.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.0%
-
89.3%
90.4%
76.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.9%
0.0%
4.0%
8.6%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places