Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sterling Park Health Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. Waite Park
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Irokuz z
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    the management at this place is an absolute joke all they do is give excuses and the run around. I would never take a family memeber I care about here ever again. How shameful

  • Marlah Lobitz
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This is a small and family-like facility that prides itself on providing competent care in a loving environment. The staff get to know the resident and their families on a personal level due to the one on one type atmosphere. A great place to live. Both my grandmothers were there and passed there, surrounded by people who cared and were a support to both me and my family. I would highly recommend this place to anyone seeking care for themselves or a loved one. :)

  • Kelly Anderson
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Disgusting. My Grandmother died here and having not ever seen the place before, I am so sad that this was the place she had to die at. The facilities are run down and filthy. Looks like nothing has been updated since the 1980's. Staff clearly hate their jobs and do not seem to have adequate training. I heard one aide say they would all be walking out soon. Very poorly managed. There is no "welcome desk" or receptionist per say. You walk in, and the rooms just begin. I would never allow anymore of my family members to stay here after seeing this.

About Sterling Park Health Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameSterling Park Healthcare Center Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 1, 1986 (31 years)
Capacity53
Residents29
Percent Occupied55%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sterling Park Health Care Center

Sterling Park Health Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 15, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

October 21, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.

November 13, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sterling Park Health Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.0%
97.1%
97.1%
97.1%
96.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
50.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.6%
27.6%
24.0%
13.6%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.7%
23.6%
31.8%
23.2%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.4%
12.5%
13.8%
14.8%
13.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.1%
11.1%
26.1%
22.7%
14.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.1%
14.9%
-
-
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7%
12.1%
0.0%
7.1%
7.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.5%
4.3%
10.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
15.2%
9.7%
12.0%
3.6%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.7%
9.1%
0.0%
7.1%
3.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.6%
0.0%
6.7%
7.1%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
2.2%
9.3%
3.5%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
94.1%
94.9%
86.1%
83.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.6%
94.1%
94.1%
94.1%
81.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
73.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
18.2%
17.9%
11.1%
5.0%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
3.8%
7.1%
4.5%
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
2.8%
2.4%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MN
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places