Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Beautiful Savior Home

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Belton Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Janet Pressly
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My dad was in the Beautiful Savior for 4 1/2 years. He had sever dementia and was in a wheel chair. They have activities everyday he could participate in. The staff was very kind and helpful to us. My mom would go basically everyday to see him and I would go weekly and sometimes more. His med were given everyday and checked on by staff. Working at a care facility home with older elderly patient is not the easiest job to have. My mom now volunteers there to help with bingo and birthday parties and other activities which also helps her.

  • Janet Blazer
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I give the home a 4.5. I was admitted for 10 days in their rehabilitation unit. I received excellent care. The Medical team was skilled and professional. Medication was given consistently on time with 100% accuracy. I was assisted getting in and out of bed. Every time I pushed the call button assistance was quickly administered even during shift change. Any medical needs were 100% given and my wants were fulfilled as well. Staff was cheerful and appeared to love their job. They were compassionate and understanding of the stressed caused by my residency. They welcomed my family and their concerns. My husband ate meals with me and he was not charged. The food was tasty, not over seasoned or too bland. The meat was tender, juicy, and not over cooked. A wide selection of fruits and vegetables were offered with each meal. Meals were served in the dinning room or private rooms. I could choose from the daily special or order from a large selection of entree. There was a large selection of snacks. The residence appeared happy and interacted with each other. There was extra daily activity offered to the residence. Intake and discharge was easy. The home was built in 1969 and in need of a face lift, but it was clean, orderly and without offending smell. My trash was emptied every shift. My floor was mopped frequently. The dinning room floor was mopped after ever meal and sometimes during meals. I have been in another rehab program and Beautiful Savior far exceeds the care I got there. If I ever need care again I hope Beautiful Savior will have a bed for me.

  • Antoinette Fisher
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I quit this place after 7 months of employment, for the most part it wasn't bad. I would say that my only real problem was the Adminstrator, BRENDA BUFFORD. She is Rude!!! And Childish

  • Evie Smith
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    We love the staff and can't thank them enough for all they do.

  • Jeffrey Packard
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My mom has been here for 6 years and it has been an absolute blessing. They're caring, kind, professional and loving. They have an exceptional workout/exercise director who leads them compassionately thru a great regiment & knew them by name and knew their personal exercise needs and limits. The food is tremendous - home cooked quality served with personal service - amazing in a facility environment. Special events happen - a country music singer guitar player sang for an hour plus at the Sept. Birthday party today - I'm visiting my mom now. The admin. patiently and creatively worked through the financial and medical requirements to have my mom well cared for here . Our Beautiful Savior Home health care professionals kindly and courteously and expertly and respectfully care for my mom with MS and wheelchair needs. The staff cares for the residents with the care and compassion of Jesus Christ and in His name which is special with eternal blessing for those touched by this beautiful ministry. I've had the blessing of working around senior care and assisted living facilities in my profession for quite a bit of time in various states and this is the home I would prefer my mom to be in because of how they love and care for her.

About Beautiful Savior Home

General Information

Legal Business NameBeautiful Savior Home
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 26, 2004 (16 years)
Capacity126
Residents109
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Beautiful Savior Home

Beautiful Savior Home was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 20, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Beautiful Savior Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
98.9%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.1%
43.5%
52.3%
61.7%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.6%
22.0%
22.0%
25.6%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
36.4%
22.6%
34.0%
25.0%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.6%
9.5%
7.2%
8.0%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.0%
16.0%
14.8%
19.5%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.0%
6.1%
5.9%
12.1%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
7.6%
1.4%
1.5%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
3.0%
4.0%
5.4%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.6%
4.8%
1.3%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

84.9%
89.7%
98.3%
97.7%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
73.6%
78.0%
-
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
4.2%
6.4%
11.8%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places