Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Buffalo Prairie Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Buffalo
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    They did a great job with my Mom's recovery. They had no problems meeting her changing needs and treatment plans. The staff and administration were responsive to her needs and listened to her and any concerns we had as the family. Mom has had a rough go over the past year and we have been blessed with a lot of good providers but when I tell you that she has completed treatment at this facility with no issues of med errors, not one incident report or fall you should take that very seriously if you are considering a rehab or placement for your loved one. Outside of the staff being so friendly and caring, the food was terrific. No one could get my Mom to eat but she has gotten her appetite back and is her strength is renewed. This placement was a pleasant, pleasant surprise and so close to home!

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I love working at Buffalo Prairie Care Center. I've worked here for a little over a year and I've been treated like nothing less than family. We all love and care about each other, residents and staff both. We have an amazing management team, and I've heard from the residents that they feel comfortable here, that it's their home away from home. I would recommend Buffalo Prairie Care Center to anyone who would like their family and friends to be treated like family. Let our home be your home. :)

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    This an amazing place to not only work but to place your family if the situation ever occurs that it is necessary. The staff at BPCC treat the residents like they are part of their family and do their very best each day to provide a exceptional home like environment for each resident to enjoy. I love working with this great group of staff and residents!!!

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    It is a wonderful facility with wonderful people! Truly feels like home when you walk through the front door!

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    This is an amazing place to work. An amazing atmosphere to be in. :)

About Buffalo Prairie Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NamePhdc LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 21, 1991 (26 years)
Capacity60
Residents50
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Buffalo Prairie Care Center

Buffalo Prairie Care Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 30, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

May 14, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Buffalo Prairie Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

4hr 20min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 35min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.9%
93.8%
93.8%
93.8%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
88.1%
78.0%
76.1%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.0%
22.2%
21.6%
15.4%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
29.3%
47.4%
28.1%
6.6%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.0%
15.0%
16.2%
28.6%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3%
28.1%
24.2%
16.7%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.9%
8.5%
3.2%
3.6%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.8%
0.0%
0.0%
17.8%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
4.5%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
15.0%
24.4%
8.3%
2.4%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
7.1%
2.5%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
9.5%
9.8%
6.5%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
4.5%
4.1%
2.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

57.1%
50.0%
50.0%
62.5%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.0%
43.5%
43.5%
43.5%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places