Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Kabul Nursing Homes Inc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Cabool Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Marlin Martin
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Filled with staff who love taking care of our family!

  • Rachel Olsen
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Kabul Nursing Home is definitely the place I want to go at that point in my life. They have caring staff not just with the residents but also with the residents families. They greet you, they enjoy your visits to their home away from home and are exceptional in every way a caregiver should be. They aren't just caretakers and Nurse Aides, they are family.

  • Jon Slaton
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    We visit 8 nursing homes a month. Kabul has a great staff, they all care about the residents. It's always clean, too.

  • Heather Vaughn
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    My 88 year oldgrandmother is staying here now. She seems to like it. She still has some independence, while still having help close by if she needs it.

  • Toni Headings
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Nicd

About Kabul Nursing Homes Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameKabul Nursing Homes Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 9, 1967 ()
Capacity99
Residents42
Percent Occupied42%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Kabul Nursing Homes Inc

Kabul Nursing Homes Inc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 8, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Kabul Nursing Homes Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 20min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.0%
12.8%
17.1%
21.9%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.7%
10.0%
15.7%
10.7%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
28.9%
22.7%
28.6%
25.6%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.3%
31.4%
16.1%
25.9%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
11.1%
18.6%
9.8%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
11.9%
11.6%
9.9%
10.7%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
0.0%
4.7%
2.4%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.5%
4.4%
2.3%
0.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.6%
85.2%
90.3%
83.3%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.4%
92.6%
92.6%
92.6%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
39.1%
-
30.0%
41.7%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
9.5%
3.8%
4.0%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places