Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Brooking Park

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Chesterfield
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Grant Calvert
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Hands down the best place for mom, we visited three places and Mike the sales person was excellent and very honest. He was spot on after three months of living there, it has been wonderful. Mom says the food is excellent and the staff is always helpful and smiling. I would recommend this facility

  • Mary Gemoules
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    We recently had to place our parents into a care facility and after an extensive search and doing our homework we chose Brooking Park. We have been treated like family since the day we took our tour. We have never had to look for elderly care and so we took a list of questions with us to each facility we visited. Mike Enloe, the Administrator, who took us for the tour and has worked with us throughout the transition commended us on asking the questions and took the time to answer each and every one. We feel he told us the truth about Brooking Park and what it offered, so we placed our parents there. Sadly our father only lived 4 weeks after he moved in. He had a quick reoccurrence of cancer and we lost him 3 days after we found out. The staff there couldn't have been more loving and caring and were by our side the whole time. Their chief nurse Tom stayed overtime to care for our father and to help us through it. He and his staff are so dedicated and they were there every moment we wanted them to be. Their Chaplin Jake is unbelievably loving and giving. He spent hours with us through those last three days and even came all the way to Edwardsville, IL to be at the funeral. Another special caregiver we want to mention is Treeana. She was especially caring to our father while he was there. Now our mother is at Brooking Park in the skilled nursing area. Joyce, the head nurse and her staff, along with Shannon the social worker, are the sweetest and most loving people and care for her every day. They don't only take care of her physical needs, they take care of her mental needs. The facility is beautiful and kept very clean. It has outdoor patios near the rooms and they get to enjoy being outside often. To sum it all up, I recently asked our mother how she liked living at Brooking Park. She said "I really like it here, and the food is really good". Then I asked her if the staff was treating her well and she said "Those people are Saints!". Thank you Brooking Park for making us a part of your family and doing the things for our parents that we couldn't.

  • Charles White
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mom lives at Brooking Park. We could not be happier with our decision to bring her here. We love the food and the care, but especially the food. The place is clean and the staff are friendly. I recommend it to anyone desiring 5-star care for their loved ones.

  • Holly Goldblum
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Terrible call lights not answered for 45 min. Wound care not done for days at a time. One day my dad called me and said his wound had gotten worse, I went in and took him to the hospital as I was pushing him out we stopped at the nursing station and told them I was taking him to th E. R. His nurse never even looked up just said "ok". That night I had my husband go up and take everything out of his room no one questioned what this strange person was doing clearing out a current residents room. Therapy was good but they are brought in from an outside source. When I mentioned to someone that my dads call light had been on for an hour the response was it wasn't an hour it was only 48 min. LIKE THAT MAKES ANY DIFFERENCE IF YOU Need TO GET TO THE BATHROOM.

  • U M
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I had a similar experience to what Paul said, particularly with regards to the social worker. She was dishonest, rude, condescending, and the theory about the hard rehab cases being discharged early has a very familiar ring to it. A couple of their nurses struck me as a bit too aggressive with my parent when it came time to sit her up. A little more gentleness and patience would've been appreciated. Also my parent's teeth needed brushing, something she could've mostly done herself if slightly encouraged, but I ended up being the one to make that happen. Her eyeglasses also went missing during her stay here. It took me a little while to see through some of the fakery of this place, but don't be fooled with deceiving appearances. What really matters at any health care oriented facility, is the quality of care, and empathy of staff. Brooking Park receives a failing grade on both, especially the second part. In fairness, I didn't think all their nurses were bad, but that department needs to be looked at, as does social services.

About Brooking Park

General Information

Legal Business NameSt. Andrews Resources For Seniors
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 13, 2004 (13 years)
Capacity37
Residents21
Percent Occupied57%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Brooking Park

Brooking Park
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 2, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

July 30, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

1.1%
0.6%
0.0%
1.2%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
81.0%
81.0%
81.0%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.1%
75.2%
63.4%
62.7%
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
3.1%
3.6%
2.9%
0.7%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places