Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Delmar Gardens On The Green

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Chesterfield
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Although the "pretty decor" may be a pleasant atmosphere. BEWARE! My husband was a resident for 3 months. His DR renewed the wrong prescription and he was given twice the prescribed dose of meds, which led to over aggressive behavior and eventually to an "incident". He ran away from the facility and could have caused great harm to himself and others. We leave our loved ones in care facilities for a REASON. THEY NEED CARE THAT WE CANNOT PROVIDE AT HOME.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Terrible they rob you blind

  • ★★★★★ 5 years ago

    THEY TREAT MY DAD WITH GREAT RESPECT.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    a very good place to work

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

About Delmar Gardens On The Green

General Information

Legal Business NameDelmar Gardens On The Green Operating, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 22, 1982 (36 years)
Capacity163
Residents145
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Delmar Gardens On The Green

Delmar Gardens On The Green
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 29, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMaintain 15 months of resident assessments in the resident's active clinical record.

March 8, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

September 11, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

June 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Delmar Gardens On The Green require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 10min
3hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
97.8%
97.8%
97.8%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.2%
98.5%
97.0%
93.2%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
22.6%
22.8%
24.1%
29.1%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.8%
17.8%
21.0%
20.5%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
8.0%
4.6%
11.0%
6.6%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.6%
13.0%
13.8%
12.1%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.7%
6.3%
16.1%
8.7%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.8%
1.8%
1.2%
3.3%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9%
6.9%
8.5%
9.3%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
17.5%
15.7%
17.5%
14.5%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
3.8%
2.3%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.0%
3.0%
2.3%
3.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
3.0%
3.1%
2.5%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

74.0%
68.5%
59.0%
62.6%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.8%
76.4%
76.4%
76.4%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
23.0%
24.0%
21.5%
9.2%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
0.0%
2.2%
2.6%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
5.6%
2.7%
1.6%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places