Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Friendship Village Chesterfield

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Chesterfield Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • dbrohm .
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I have lived at Friendship Village for almost 6 years. Contrary to what Marlynne K says, the food has NEVER been horrendous. With the construction going on we were dining in temporary facilities awaiting the new dining room. During this period, sometimes food service was challenging, but always good. Now with the new spacious dining room opening on November 4, 2019 we have a beautiful dining facility with new furniture, china, etc. all prepared in a new world class kitchen by great chefs. The food has definitely been a solid 5 stars in the new dining room!

  • Latrice Moore-Patton
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I was brought on as a full- time Certified Nurse Assistant. So far I've enjoyed the environment. Great Energy from the Managers and Coworkers, and the residents are great!

  • Burton Campbell
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Having worked here almost two years, I'm greatly impressed with the dedication, skill, and loving care provided by the staff. In addition, the residents are amazing, vibrant people who make this community a wonderful place to work and live. Now over halfway through our complete campus makeover, Friendship Village is being positioned to serve the community well for many, many years to come.

  • Joyce katz
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Aptly named, Friendship Village is a very friendly, welcoming place. And most important, it is a place where services consistently exceed expectations.

  • sammatha franks
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I'm not even sure where to begin, i have been employed at friendship village for a couple of years now and have seen so many different changes and have seen so many different people come in and leave, because of management and as for as nursing the director of nursing treats her aids like pure trash, i never worked at a place and have been treated so badly. I'm not the only one who feels this way majority of nursing staff feels the same way and complains among'st each other, if you want good staff and want people to stay you need to learn how to treat your employees and learn how to talk to people in a professional manner. I hardly ever see her come on the floor and ask the staff how are things going are hardly ever thank us for a job well done. The only reason i continue to stay employed at this company because of my relationship with the residents and the family. We need change at this established our voices needs to be heard by higher management (CORPORATE) its sad when you don't enjoy going to work anymore because of how you're treated. I would not recommend working here at all.

About Friendship Village Chesterfield

General Information

Legal Business NameFriendship Village Of West County
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 15, 1975 (44 years)
Capacity99
Residents82
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Friendship Village Chesterfield

Friendship Village Chesterfield was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Friendship Village Chesterfield has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Friendship Village Chesterfield require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 25min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
3hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

87.5%
87.2%
87.2%
87.2%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.9%
58.1%
49.3%
59.2%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
44.7%
41.7%
55.1%
40.8%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.3%
9.7%
8.6%
15.3%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.4%
19.4%
19.2%
20.0%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.8%
11.1%
9.6%
5.8%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3%
15.0%
21.1%
13.8%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
8.3%
6.9%
4.4%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9%
2.8%
5.6%
10.3%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.9%
8.2%
4.6%
8.1%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
4.2%
5.6%
7.4%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7%
4.1%
4.0%
4.2%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
1.2%
2.2%
1.1%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

54.9%
43.8%
29.1%
43.6%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.1%
43.8%
43.8%
43.8%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
82.7%
87.4%
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.8%
9.5%
13.0%
6.7%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places