Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Mason Pointe Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Chesterfield Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • melissa bizzle
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I cannot say enough good things about Mason Pointe. They took excellent care of my mother-in-law during her recent rehab stay. All of the staff were so caring and friendly. They loved her like their own!! They were so helpful to my husband and I as we looked for places and resources for assisted living after her discharge. The facility is warm and homey. It's clean and welcoming. I highly recommend Mason Pointe!!

  • Victoria Riddle
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    When my uncle went to Mason Pointe two years ago he chose it because it was a five star facility. It has now fallen to a feeble 3.4 and that is generous. Another home I found for slightly less than the rediculous $9000 a month he pays is like a country club and has employees with decades of service. Unfortunately at this point he is so afraid of change that even letting him run out of toilet paper the other week did not get him to move. For $9000 a month if he wants three rolls of toilet paper and paper towels in his bathroom he is certainly paying for it. There are a handful of loyal employees who are overworked. Mason Pointe is perpetually under staffed. Their workers are a revolving door. I have witnessed many times staff sitting on couches in the hallways playing on their phones instead of tending to the residents. The housekeeping is sporadic and the food mediocre. The laundry recently undependable. Mason Pointe just finished spending tens of thousands of dollars totally remodeling the lobby area and added a small built in desk in the first floor hallway not meant to be staffed just for show. The rooms look like sparsely appointed hospital rooms. For $9000 a month the rooms should look like home. The social worker who I spoke with today is unconcerned about my concerns about my uncle. Her main concern seems to be keeping the peace. When I asked her about a particular situation she told me I could call the nursing station myself and let them know. Is this what $9000 a month buys these days.? I think not! Do not waste your money!

  • Brendan Coady
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Placing our mother here was a tough decision. After she spent time here last year for rehab it was an easy and straightforward process. The staff from placement to everyday care are impressive and really care about your loved ones like they are their own. She has interacted with more residents and has enjoyed her time there so far. They have activities everyday to keep residents involved and interacting with one another. A special thanks to Kathleen and Wendy for all of their help with the transition and how they go out of their way to help both my mother and myself with any questions we have or have had.

  • Taylor Fennessey
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    We moved my mom into Mason Pointe Rehab in September. The staff and facility has been FANTASTIC. Every CNA, Nurse, PT, Doctors and Administrators have been very attentive to my mom's needs. The facility is beautiful and clean. I highly recommend it.

  • Tim Creedon
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Mason Pointe has earned this 5 star rating with a great deal of hard work, dedication and caring for my Mother who is recovering from a stroke. If you would have asked me in the first month that my Mother entered Mason Pointe the review would have been different. What I appreciate and respect about Mason Pointe's team is they took all feedback and at times early on harsh critiques and went above and beyond to get better and make sure my Mother receives the best care and attention. They raised the bar for themselves and have truly done amazing work with my Mother. My Mother still has a long way to go with her recovery and transition to Assisted Living but with the team at Mason Pointe's continued hard work and desire to treat each resident as family I have no doubt she is in good hands for that journey. Thank you for all your efforts.

About Mason Pointe Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLutheran Senior Services
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 19, 1995 (25 years)
Capacity274
Residents157
Percent Occupied57%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Mason Pointe Care Center

Mason Pointe Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 4, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionLimit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Protect current or future residents from giving up their Medicaid or Medicare benefits; or 2) follow federal rules for admissions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Mason Pointe Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 45min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 50min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.1%
70.7%
70.7%
70.7%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.4%
71.1%
77.4%
68.7%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.7%
28.6%
34.1%
52.5%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.4%
24.2%
23.7%
22.1%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.7%
9.5%
33.7%
32.4%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.5%
20.0%
20.0%
16.7%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.8%
20.9%
36.6%
27.2%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.3%
12.5%
14.4%
4.2%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.6%
12.1%
8.8%
7.0%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
10.3%
4.4%
4.8%
3.3%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8%
1.8%
0.0%
1.1%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7%
0.0%
1.9%
2.1%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
2.6%
1.9%
3.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4%
2.6%
1.2%
1.5%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

78.7%
79.9%
84.2%
80.3%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.6%
82.3%
82.3%
82.3%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.5%
57.6%
53.4%
60.1%
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
43.5%
32.9%
32.7%
28.3%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
2.2%
2.1%
1.3%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
1.2%
0.9%
0.3%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places