Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

South Hampton Place

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Columbia
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My grandma is currently a resident at this facility. I visited with her yesterday and she went on and on about how great the staff has been treating her. We all have those worries of our family members being mistreated or not getting the care they deserve. After hearing what my grandma had to say, really left me feeling reassured that she was getting what she needed. It really warmed my heart and the staff treats her as if she were their Gma. Thank you for having such a great team! It is a tough job and my Gma is satisfied with her experience so far! I would recommend this place!

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I chose this Facility for my mother. I wish I would have done a bit of research myself, not just gone by the recommendation of a friend. The DON is rude and unprofessional. She didn't appreciate me asking questions about my Mother's care. Nor did another Nurse. I had to leave a few voice mails, with the House Dr. Dr Craven's in order for him to actually visit my Mother after she;d been in there a few weeks. He let her lay in pain for weeks, he would only prescribe Tylenol, for a broken arm and Pelvis. A Med tech actually brought her to tears, she acted like a Bully ,yelling at Mother because she is unable to swallow several pills at once. I have friends who are med techs they were actually APPALLED BY THIS WOMAN'S ACTIONS. Another tried to force unwanted pills down Mothers throat. Another Aid was behaving in an unkind and unprofessional manner and when she called him out on it, he behaved as if it was a Race issue because he is black and she is white. I wish I would have investigated this Facility first instead of just taking the word of a friend. Her Hubby was treated very well. What the difference was ,other than the Hall she was on I guess I will never know. The OT is nice enough, but I think/feel she wanted/decided ti was time for Mother to go home sooner than what I feel was the right time. The Social Worker told me the Insurance Co wouldn't pay for one more day. Even though they know she has no help at home until next week, Wednesday. I don't live in the same City she does and I have no vehicle. I still need to go and make her house a safe environment. To many trip hazards. The Home knew it would be the weekend before I could do this. But they don't care about that. Maybe they are thinking that if God forbid she has another accident , I would send Mother back to them. NOPE! I would choose someplace else. This place is short staffed, to the point that patients needs are not being met in a timely manner. My Mother was released on the the 31st, the Home Health Care Company that South Hampton claim they refereed her to, never showed up. On the second day I called and spoke with Phil who is the Director, I explained the situation and also informed him Mother was sent home with someone else s medication! Fortunately she caught the error herself, and therefore didn't take the medication. I also realize accident happen. but it has been one thing after another with this place! I am beyond fed up.

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    I did my CNA clinicals here. I didn't like it. The head nurse isn't very nice to her workers. The place has odd smells and also is very outdated.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

About South Hampton Place

General Information

Legal Business NameN & R Of South Hampton, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 14, 1995 (22 years)
Capacity100
Residents81
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for South Hampton Place

South Hampton Place
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 21, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residents assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCompletely assess the resident at least every twelve months.

November 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

December 1, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of South Hampton Place require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 15min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.4%
91.5%
91.5%
91.5%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.9%
96.9%
95.6%
94.6%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
41.9%
55.3%
31.7%
12.2%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.7%
9.3%
12.7%
31.7%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.6%
35.4%
21.9%
16.2%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.1%
14.3%
13.8%
17.2%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.5%
21.2%
14.5%
15.0%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.4%
14.1%
10.1%
15.5%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.6%
3.1%
7.5%
6.8%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.9%
8.1%
2.6%
10.8%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.0%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.5%
4.7%
0.0%
1.4%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
1.5%
0.0%
1.4%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.8%
4.4%
2.7%
2.7%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.1%
86.1%
91.3%
85.7%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.8%
88.9%
88.9%
88.9%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.1%
76.3%
-
64.2%
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
35.6%
27.8%
26.4%
27.1%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
4.6%
5.8%
1.6%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places