Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cuba Manor Inc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Cuba Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Reuben & Melissa Popp
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Love that every person has a responsibility and no one is ever sitting around. They are a little slow to respond to call lights, but it's mostly due to staffing shortages. Overall care has been good, they are responsive to family members and always listen.

  • CD Millman
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Placing one's loved one in the complete care of another is a huge decision. Due to the need for a thorough, yet urgent decision, we chose Cuba Manor. From the moment of stepping into the doors, we were greeted with a warm and friendly welcome. Their compassionate understanding and expertise in handling a challenging decision was with ease and kindness. Every step of the way was gently guided as we traversed into the unknown. The staff and everyone we met far exceeded our expectations. They educated us with whatever level of detail we needed to make decisions that had seemed insurmountable. They went over and above the job requirements, going out of their way to make sure our needs, as well as the needs of the other residents were met. We literally saw staff running through the halls to respond to calls as quickly as possible. Our loved one's roommate, could not have been any nicer. He kept us updated on the many activities available, watched over our loved one as a Guardian, as well as informing us of anything he thought might be helpful to know. Although it was shorter than anticipated there came a time to make an end of life decision. We were able to move into a single room with ease and speed, respecting both our and the roommate's privacy in the midst of these delicate and precious times. The room was comfortable and large, allowing the opportunity to spend the night if we desired. And we did. They brought food and comfort with reassurance each step of the way. Every detail was handled with tremendous, love, care, and great respect. We could not be more grateful to have chosen and entered the doors of Cuba Manor. We wish to thank everyone who touched our lives. Your gracious kindness shall always be remembered.

  • Wilma Vicini
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Disclosure...I work here. Now for my review....I have worked at Cuba Manor for 10 years now. My mom slipped in to Alzheimers/Dimentia and could no longer be left alone. I work with some of the most caring and loving people. I think overall they do an amazing job with my mom. Some people don't quite understand that everyone doesn't have time to spend one one one with your loved one...but I know they do get individual attention when time allows. I see it and I do it. I take time to speak to the residents or give a hug or a smile. So does everyone else. But they have a job to do. I wouldn't want my mom anywhere else. It looks clean, it smells good, and I must say...(bragging a little) the food is excellent. I sleep good at night knowing my mom is in good hands.

  • amy merrihue
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    This is a terrible death trap of a facility. Not only has my family members health needs increased, weight gain, now wheelchair dependent, hygiene needs unmet, food from 2 yrs ago found on the shelf 3 feet from the bed, trash and food found in bed side table, nails grown so long that bacteria had built under the nails on hands and feet. The staff ONLY takes the patients,upon request, outside when the staff smokes. My particular family member has't been outside in fresh air for several months (I am writing this in July). I could go on with specific situations. Staff has a ongoing denial of responsibility, "that's not on my shift". Lobby sets a decent impression, then enter the living space of the residents there is an overwhelming smell of urine and death. When attempt to relocate patient they flagged him/her as "noncompliant" Any intelligent individual recognizes that as a greed for the generated revenue through their facility at steak. I await the near future to have my family member removed from here!

  • Katelyn
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Cuba Manor Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameCuba Manor, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 22, 1996 (24 years)
Capacity90
Residents87
Percent Occupied97%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cuba Manor Inc

Cuba Manor Inc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 12, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cuba Manor Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
1hr 60min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 40min
3hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.1%
94.0%
94.0%
94.0%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.5%
61.2%
54.2%
57.1%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.5%
35.7%
26.0%
26.0%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.6%
21.5%
25.9%
23.8%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
27.5%
10.8%
5.8%
23.7%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.5%
9.8%
11.7%
10.3%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.0%
17.5%
7.7%
13.3%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2%
4.5%
6.1%
6.2%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
3.3%
3.8%
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
29.3%
16.2%
8.8%
3.9%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.9%
4.5%
0.0%
1.2%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
1.5%
2.7%
1.2%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

28.1%
28.3%
33.3%
16.7%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.2%
32.7%
32.7%
32.7%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
33.3%
18.4%
8.3%
-
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
7.7%
-
-
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
2.4%
4.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places