Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Villas-A Stonebridge Community, The

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. De Soto
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Villas-A Stonebridge Community, The

General Information

Legal Business NameEldercare Of Mid-Missouri Iv, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 20, 2003 (13 years)
Capacity51
Residents48
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Villas-A Stonebridge Community, The

Villas-A Stonebridge Community, The
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 14, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that all nurse aids who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training or have been deemed competent to provide nursing and nursing related services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

September 24, 2015 - 1 year ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

December 5, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSend unopened mail from residents and promptly deliver unopened mail to residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Villas-A Stonebridge Community, The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 5min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 15min
3hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.6%
95.7%
95.7%
95.7%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
50.0%
97.7%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
28.6%
10.0%
22.7%
35.0%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.7%
37.1%
40.5%
36.1%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.0%
12.3%
32.4%
34.6%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.3%
14.3%
14.6%
15.9%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.1%
11.8%
25.7%
23.5%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.6%
7.5%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
0.0%
4.9%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.3%
4.7%
7.0%
9.1%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.1%
75.9%
85.7%
100.0%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.3%
93.1%
93.1%
93.1%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
-
-
-
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened