Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Dixon Nursing & Rehab

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Dixon Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cleatus Lynch
    ★★★★★ 12 months ago

    Would never use or recommend this place ,it's old and the staff to me are only interested in a pay check. Not very clean ,food look horrible,the place smelt.

  • Konnie Delaney
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Not a Nursing home that i would recommend. There is an obvious negative attitude between management and employees that is apparent to visitors. I could tell the CNA's around me really cared about the residents as they were doing what they could to make each resident know they are cared about. But as i sat with a friend in the common area i could hear the way management spoke to the lower level workers. Negative Comments and attitude should be made private as family and friends of loved ones who are either living there or visiting the facility do not need to hear this. It is obvious there are too many people who think they are in charge when it comes to the way the employees understand their duties. Perhaps a meeting with the front office and nursing care regarding this could resolve that issue. The smell of urine was very strong when i first came into the facility. They tried to cover it up but it was very strong. Garbage bags lined the halls.

  • Tina
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My husband was there one week and i had to transfer him to a better nursing facility. The place is so out of date and dirty. No mechanical beds and he required one. The wheel chair must have been from the 70s and hurt him so bad to sit in it plus it was a youth size and my husband is over 6 ft. tall, also the bed wss too short for him and with him having a stroke it messed up his bad leg and foot. One nurse was a total B----H and snapped at me saying she wss 4 hrs. late and thats why she wss late getting him taken care.....I wa like WTF. The food is nasty and thr portions small. The CNAs were nice but PT did not show them how to transfer him from bed to wheel chair ans so forth so he got drug around in bed. He required 2 people to move him but they never had enough staff to have 2 people to move him. One day they actually had a dwarf trying to get my 6 ft. Husband out of the bed, she hurt his bad arm and nearly dropped him. The whole place needs a total overhaul and updated, it is such a depressing place. They park everyone in the hallway and thats where they sit all day. He was not bathed while he was there and he would soil his depends, they wiped him with wet cloths but he had stool dried to him so bad that it toik the new nursing home forever to get it removed from his skin which was inected with thrush. My and husband are extremely happy with the place hes in now. Its bright and cheery and totally state of the art, with electric beds and great staff. People need to quit seeing the 4.5 stars this place is rated at cause that is with only 2 people writting a review and there are ambulatory people living there cause they are homeless so of course theyll write a good review and give it 4 or 5 stars. I dont normally write reviews but i felt i had to on this one. People need to know what conditions they're loved ones are going to. Thank you

  • John Egbear
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Unprofessional in every way. Workers don't typically treat any resident correctly, workers treat other workers poorly, and the entire place looks terrible. Needs redone.

  • Kimberley Thornton
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Love helping people out

About Dixon Nursing & Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameN & R Of Dixon, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 7, 1990 (30 years)
Capacity60
Residents51
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Dixon Nursing & Rehab

Dixon Nursing & Rehab was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 29, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Dixon Nursing & Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
3hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7%
82.4%
76.3%
61.0%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
14.3%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.3%
37.5%
39.5%
35.9%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
8.2%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.3%
20.7%
30.3%
26.5%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
0.0%
8.3%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.6%
12.1%
9.1%
11.1%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4%
10.6%
4.3%
1.9%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.5%
9.4%
17.6%
16.2%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
5.9%
5.3%
5.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.6%
5.9%
2.6%
2.4%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
3.1%
2.5%
4.6%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

45.0%
45.8%
29.6%
25.0%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
9.5%
8.7%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
5.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places