Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Andrew's At Francis Place

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Missouri
  3. Eureka Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Michael McDonough
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    We looked at a lot of places. St. Andrews at Francis Place "felt" right for Mike. Everyone was friendly and we recognized how homelike it was. There's a community of staff, nurses and aides, as well as kitchen staff and servers and cleaning staff that nurtures each resident. PT and OT were great! The rehabilitation area of the home is excellent. There are activities each day to keep residents occupied that develop the spiritual, physical and mental parts of the body. Come for a tour and see for yourself. Gail McDonough

  • Fran Miley
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    If I could give this place 5 stars plus I would. It has the most amazing views, which I think adds to the healing and spiritual needs that enhance care, but most importantly, St. Andrew's has become like family for my family. Over the past couple of years, we've had multiple, short term medical issues that have required short-term care. The 1st time, we had family stay, I cried with happiness that I had found such a wonderfully friendly, welcoming, clean, competent, and caring environment. The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th time we had family stay, I smiled with happiness because I knew my family was in the best hands. I knew without doubt that they would not only get great patient care, but that they would feel at home, well cared for, and treated with respect and like family while there. We love St. Andrew's, where they pay attention to physical, mental, spiritual, and community needs that a person has. Now we don't have family there, but we go back and visit to say hello to our friends, get hugs, and stay connected to our wonderful caregiver and staff "family". You will smile and feel love from the moment you check in, to sharing delicious meals made by the great kitchen staff, to the caring and extremely good rehab staff, to front office staff who handle everything with grace, to the wonderfully caring and attentive care staff, to the awesome medical team, to the kind volunteers visit -- I highly recommend this place to anyone.

  • Anne Daniels
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My mother is a new resident at Francis Place. My sister and I knew from the moment we walked in the door for our tour that this was a special community. My mother has had experience with several rehab facilities, from the classic nightmare nursing home to something much more "higher end." This is, by far, the best encounter we have had. The transition was very smooth because Vikki, the Director of Admissions, was there to answer any question and step in where needed. The staff is extremely helpful and caring. More importantly, there are sufficient numbers of them to make sure that each resident gets the care and attention that they need. My mother loves the activities, especially Bingo, and she is able to participate because the staff makes sure she gets there. She is much more socially engaged now than at her previous independent residence because, as her health declined, she could not get herself out. She is very happy at FP and loves her new home. We, as a family, are thrilled with her situation because, after the last few years of constant stress and worry, we know that she is safe and well-cared for. We would highly recommend Francis Place to anyone looking for a skilled nursing facility for a loved one.

  • Kurt Glore
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I can't say enough about this place. My mom lived there for over 3 years and staff was absolutely wonderful. Everything from the food to the activities to the nursing seemed to be tailored to my moms liking. I have talked to other families and they have said the same things. They have definitely nailed it. They also have completely renovated the entire building and it looks great. Thank you all for taking such great care of my mom.

  • Allison Hunter
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    We love this community! Our mother has been a resident there for a little over 2 years and we really could not have asked for a better place! The admission process was very smooth and we felt very comforted during each step of the way. The nursing staff there is wonderful and so very caring, you can really tell that they take the time to get to know each of their residents and we really appreciate that! There is a very 'homey' and comfortable feeling when you walk in the door and the views are beautiful!! The housekeeping staff do a very good job at keeping things clean too! They also have a great therapy team there as well. If you are in need of nursing care for a family member we would highly recommend St. Andrew's at Francis Place!

About St Andrew's At Francis Place

General Information

Legal Business NameSt Andrews At Francis Place
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 4, 1983 (37 years)
Capacity120
Residents94
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Andrew's At Francis Place

St Andrew's At Francis Place was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 21, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth Inspection1) Protect current or future residents from giving up their Medicaid or Medicare benefits; or 2) follow federal rules for admissions.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth Inspection1) Review the work of each nurse aide every year; and 2) give regular in-service training based upon these reviews.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

August 6, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$5,363 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Andrew's At Francis Place require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 25min
2hr 10min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
15min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 20min
3hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.9%
97.9%
97.9%
97.9%
93.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.8%
86.5%
84.3%
81.4%
88.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
36.1%
23.3%
23.5%
19.4%
32.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.6%
17.6%
15.7%
17.4%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.1%
20.1%
11.8%
15.5%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.3%
19.1%
15.9%
16.5%
19.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.5%
16.9%
27.7%
15.4%
14.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.0%
11.6%
9.6%
9.4%
7.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.1%
6.0%
6.7%
6.1%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
2.6%
5.3%
10.0%
6.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
3.5%
3.8%
2.5%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8%
5.8%
4.8%
4.7%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4%
6.7%
6.0%
5.8%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
2.0%
2.1%
2.5%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

52.9%
48.7%
59.2%
56.1%
74.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
61.8%
51.3%
51.3%
51.3%
73.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
69.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.0%
21.2%
12.9%
24.1%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
4.8%
3.0%
3.8%
2.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
3.8%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places