Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Twin Pines Adult Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Missouri (MO)
  4. Kirksville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Twin Pines Adult Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeGovernment - City/County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1983 (34 years)
Capacity152
Residents75
Percent Occupied49%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Twin Pines Adult Care Center

Twin Pines Adult Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Missouri Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 3, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that special or therapeutic diets are ordered by the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

May 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide proper discharge planning and communication, of the resident's health status and summary of the resident's nursing home stay.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionEncode each residentís assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Twin Pines Adult Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 50min
1hr 60min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
3hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
37.8%
25.0%
26.8%
22.7%
33.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.0%
14.5%
23.0%
18.0%
27.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.4%
4.0%
3.7%
3.8%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.4%
9.4%
11.7%
11.7%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.0%
3.7%
8.2%
0.0%
14.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.2%
9.0%
7.2%
5.0%
8.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5%
1.8%
7.8%
9.4%
6.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.7%
3.5%
9.4%
1.6%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2%
5.3%
3.1%
3.1%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.0%
4.1%
6.1%
4.1%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.0%
94.9%
91.4%
90.8%
74.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.3%
89.8%
89.7%
89.7%
74.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.0%
68.3%
69.1%
68.1%
66.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
27.5%
23.1%
22.0%
21.0%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
0.0%
1.7%
1.7%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016MO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened